From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Eli Zaretskii Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Cleaner way to not build the ctags that ships with emacs? Date: Wed, 09 Mar 2016 23:06:01 +0200 Message-ID: <83ziu7mkee.fsf@gnu.org> References: Reply-To: Eli Zaretskii NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1457557591 9714 80.91.229.3 (9 Mar 2016 21:06:31 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Wed, 9 Mar 2016 21:06:31 +0000 (UTC) Cc: emacs-devel@gnu.org To: Kaushal Modi Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Wed Mar 09 22:06:16 2016 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1adlJ5-0006YH-4m for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Wed, 09 Mar 2016 22:06:11 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:44515 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1adlJ4-0007iM-3B for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Wed, 09 Mar 2016 16:06:10 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:59643) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1adlIn-0007i5-Rv for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 09 Mar 2016 16:05:54 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1adlIi-0007Jz-Tt for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 09 Mar 2016 16:05:53 -0500 Original-Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::e]:47277) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1adlIi-0007Jv-QL; Wed, 09 Mar 2016 16:05:48 -0500 Original-Received: from 84.94.185.246.cable.012.net.il ([84.94.185.246]:4300 helo=home-c4e4a596f7) by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.2:RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:128) (Exim 4.82) (envelope-from ) id 1adlIi-0002jN-4V; Wed, 09 Mar 2016 16:05:48 -0500 In-reply-to: (message from Kaushal Modi on Wed, 9 Mar 2016 15:56:03 -0500) X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] X-Received-From: 2001:4830:134:3::e X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:201325 Archived-At: > From: Kaushal Modi > Date: Wed, 9 Mar 2016 15:56:03 -0500 > > Is there a clean way to prevent the building of emacs ctags binary and man pages attogether? May be a > configure option? Why not put your Exuberant ctags elsewhere, and use a shell alias to invoke it?