From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Eli Zaretskii Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: [PATCH v3] Add systemd socket launching support Date: Fri, 01 Apr 2016 22:58:52 +0300 Message-ID: <83zitdrthf.fsf@gnu.org> References: <874mbn7kmn.fsf@mattleach.net> <871t6qkc3h.fsf@mattleach.net> <8337r6v930.fsf@gnu.org> <83y48ytpah.fsf@gnu.org> <83pou9u7md.fsf@gnu.org> <83a8ldtpif.fsf@gnu.org> Reply-To: Eli Zaretskii NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1459540775 23069 80.91.229.3 (1 Apr 2016 19:59:35 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Fri, 1 Apr 2016 19:59:35 +0000 (UTC) Cc: matthew@mattleach.net, emacs-devel@gnu.org To: Stefan Monnier Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Fri Apr 01 21:59:32 2016 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1am5EC-0007BR-0K for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Fri, 01 Apr 2016 21:59:32 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:46167 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1am5EB-0006ah-5E for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Fri, 01 Apr 2016 15:59:31 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:60320) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1am5E7-0006aM-1r for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 01 Apr 2016 15:59:27 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1am5E2-0000NM-P8 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 01 Apr 2016 15:59:26 -0400 Original-Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::e]:49900) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1am5E2-0000NI-Lh; Fri, 01 Apr 2016 15:59:22 -0400 Original-Received: from 84.94.185.246.cable.012.net.il ([84.94.185.246]:3228 helo=home-c4e4a596f7) by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.2:RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:128) (Exim 4.82) (envelope-from ) id 1am5E1-0008Lg-UX; Fri, 01 Apr 2016 15:59:22 -0400 In-reply-to: (message from Stefan Monnier on Fri, 01 Apr 2016 14:43:55 -0400) X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] X-Received-From: 2001:4830:134:3::e X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:202576 Archived-At: > From: Stefan Monnier > Cc: matthew@mattleach.net, emacs-devel@gnu.org > Date: Fri, 01 Apr 2016 14:43:55 -0400 > > >> > I'm not sure myself, but I'm not a criminal, so don't ask me about the > >> > details. I just know that exposing a handle through which someone can > >> > feed Emacs any commands they want is a bad idea. > >> Which part of my proposal exposes such a handle? > > You asked for the original version, which did that. That's the only > > proposal I understand you made, and that's what I was talking about. > > Then I don't know wheat you mean by "expose". It's already readily > available from the environment, so in which way is it more exposed? If systemd exposes its sockets in the environment, it's their bug. When we do the same, it's ours.