From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail From: Eli Zaretskii Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: [Emacs-diffs] master 1392ec7 2/3: A quicker check for quit Date: Thu, 26 Jan 2017 22:02:09 +0200 Message-ID: <83ziid1tfi.fsf@gnu.org> References: <20170126052541.29089.5382@vcs.savannah.gnu.org> <20170126052542.828422201BC@vcs.savannah.gnu.org> Reply-To: Eli Zaretskii NNTP-Posting-Host: blaine.gmane.org X-Trace: blaine.gmane.org 1485460969 11547 195.159.176.226 (26 Jan 2017 20:02:49 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@blaine.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Thu, 26 Jan 2017 20:02:49 +0000 (UTC) Cc: monnier@iro.umontreal.ca, emacs-devel@gnu.org To: Paul Eggert Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Thu Jan 26 21:02:44 2017 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by blaine.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1cWqFi-0002Fd-N1 for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Thu, 26 Jan 2017 21:02:38 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:40870 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1cWqFm-00066G-Ej for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Thu, 26 Jan 2017 15:02:42 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:52459) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1cWqFf-00065g-5a for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 26 Jan 2017 15:02:37 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1cWqFa-0007Vs-Mw for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 26 Jan 2017 15:02:35 -0500 Original-Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::e]:52942) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1cWqFa-0007Vo-KF; Thu, 26 Jan 2017 15:02:30 -0500 Original-Received: from 84.94.185.246.cable.012.net.il ([84.94.185.246]:3742 helo=home-c4e4a596f7) by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.2:RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:256) (Exim 4.82) (envelope-from ) id 1cWqFZ-0005OV-A4; Thu, 26 Jan 2017 15:02:30 -0500 In-reply-to: (message from Paul Eggert on Thu, 26 Jan 2017 09:45:09 -0800) X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] X-Received-From: 2001:4830:134:3::e X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.21 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "Emacs-devel" Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:211625 Archived-At: > From: Paul Eggert > Date: Thu, 26 Jan 2017 09:45:09 -0800 > > This leads me to wonder: what's the point of immediate_quit? If > immediate_quit doesn't always cause C-g to immediately quit, why are we > bothering with an immediate_quit variable? It's only tested in the TTY input code, AFAIK. > Or if immediate_quit makes sense, then should we arrange for a C-g > under X to behave more like C-g on a terminal, and do a longjmp? I hope not.