From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail From: Eli Zaretskii Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: scroll-down with pixel transition Date: Wed, 19 Apr 2017 19:10:59 +0300 Message-ID: <83zifcbcoc.fsf@gnu.org> References: <693E1D44-797B-4B0D-9D0B-6FEB6DF32531@misasa.okayama-u.ac.jp> <83lgqze7mq.fsf@gnu.org> <20170419.212155.180931830.tkk@misasa.okayama-u.ac.jp> <83a87ccv8s.fsf@gnu.org> <834lxkcssf.fsf@gnu.org> Reply-To: Eli Zaretskii NNTP-Posting-Host: blaine.gmane.org X-Trace: blaine.gmane.org 1492618264 6418 195.159.176.226 (19 Apr 2017 16:11:04 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@blaine.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Wed, 19 Apr 2017 16:11:04 +0000 (UTC) Cc: cpitclaudel@gmail.com, tkk@misasa.okayama-u.ac.jp, yuri.v.khan@gmail.com, emacs-devel@gnu.org To: Kaushal Modi Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Wed Apr 19 18:10:58 2017 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by blaine.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1d0sC0-0001V3-Ba for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Wed, 19 Apr 2017 18:10:56 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:49251 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1d0sC6-00057a-0b for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Wed, 19 Apr 2017 12:11:02 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:41919) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1d0sBY-00057S-A3 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 19 Apr 2017 12:10:29 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1d0sBX-00074b-EW for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 19 Apr 2017 12:10:28 -0400 Original-Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::e]:49059) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1d0sBS-000738-4s; Wed, 19 Apr 2017 12:10:22 -0400 Original-Received: from 84.94.185.246.cable.012.net.il ([84.94.185.246]:1746 helo=home-c4e4a596f7) by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.2:RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:256) (Exim 4.82) (envelope-from ) id 1d0sBR-0002Bb-Ak; Wed, 19 Apr 2017 12:10:21 -0400 In-reply-to: (message from Kaushal Modi on Wed, 19 Apr 2017 15:49:43 +0000) X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] X-Received-From: 2001:4830:134:3::e X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.21 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "Emacs-devel" Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:214132 Archived-At: > From: Kaushal Modi > Date: Wed, 19 Apr 2017 15:49:43 +0000 > Cc: cpitclaudel@gmail.com, tkk@misasa.okayama-u.ac.jp, emacs-devel@gnu.org, > yuri.v.khan@gmail.com > > I can try my hand providing a patch for that. Which section should I update? "Coding Conventions". TIA. > But for the patch Tak provided, do we want to continue with the unspoken convention of not ending vars in "-p"? I'd like first to hear what people think about this new convention.