From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail From: Eli Zaretskii Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#16828: 24.3.50; eval-expression, character representation of integer results time-consuming Date: Sat, 20 May 2017 00:09:24 +0300 Message-ID: <83zie81rln.fsf@gnu.org> References: <83mwhk4v48.fsf@gnu.org> <83txbr2sye.fsf@gnu.org> <87zjljf086.fsf@rosalinde.fritz.box> <83a9di3lt1.fsf@gnu.org> <877g8mb3lh.fsf@Rainer.invalid> <530DBEEE.8060805@gmx.at> <87zig84s6l.fsf@users.sourceforge.net> <83wpbc9ldc.fsf@gnu.org> <83lgrs9k8p.fsf@gnu.org> <87inmw3x5b.fsf@users.sourceforge.net> <83fui09i5z.fsf@gnu.org> <87fui03pjr.fsf@users.sourceforge.net> <834lyg9b9t.fsf@gnu.org> <87a88752ej.fsf@users.sourceforge.net> <83y3vr9909.fsf@gnu.org> <878tltiure.fsf@users.sourceforge.net> <83efvl4ann.fsf@gnu.org> <8760gwin7f.fsf@users.sourceforge.net> Reply-To: Eli Zaretskii NNTP-Posting-Host: blaine.gmane.org X-Trace: blaine.gmane.org 1495228217 3695 195.159.176.226 (19 May 2017 21:10:17 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@blaine.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Fri, 19 May 2017 21:10:17 +0000 (UTC) Cc: 16828@debbugs.gnu.org To: npostavs@users.sourceforge.net Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Fri May 19 23:10:11 2017 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by blaine.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1dBpA1-0000mI-Ae for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Fri, 19 May 2017 23:10:09 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:60276 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1dBpA6-0003dg-N5 for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Fri, 19 May 2017 17:10:14 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:50382) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1dBp9x-0003dT-1g for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Fri, 19 May 2017 17:10:05 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1dBp9t-0003sc-S8 for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Fri, 19 May 2017 17:10:05 -0400 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.43]:52982) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:16) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1dBp9t-0003sW-Oo for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Fri, 19 May 2017 17:10:01 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1dBp9t-000609-IV for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Fri, 19 May 2017 17:10:01 -0400 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: Eli Zaretskii Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Fri, 19 May 2017 21:10:01 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 16828 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs X-GNU-PR-Keywords: patch Original-Received: via spool by 16828-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B16828.149522819423052 (code B ref 16828); Fri, 19 May 2017 21:10:01 +0000 Original-Received: (at 16828) by debbugs.gnu.org; 19 May 2017 21:09:54 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:55659 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1dBp9l-0005zj-5u for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 19 May 2017 17:09:53 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.92]:59348) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1dBp9k-0005zX-4D for 16828@debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 19 May 2017 17:09:52 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1dBp9b-0003pc-RH for 16828@debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 19 May 2017 17:09:46 -0400 Original-Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::e]:36344) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1dBp9b-0003pY-Nm; Fri, 19 May 2017 17:09:43 -0400 Original-Received: from 84.94.185.246.cable.012.net.il ([84.94.185.246]:4717 helo=home-c4e4a596f7) by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.2:RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:256) (Exim 4.82) (envelope-from ) id 1dBp9a-0004vE-Vv; Fri, 19 May 2017 17:09:43 -0400 In-reply-to: <8760gwin7f.fsf@users.sourceforge.net> (npostavs@users.sourceforge.net) X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] X-Received-From: 208.118.235.43 X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "bug-gnu-emacs" Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.bugs:132656 Archived-At: > From: npostavs@users.sourceforge.net > Cc: 16828@debbugs.gnu.org > Date: Fri, 19 May 2017 16:52:20 -0400 > > >> +(octal, hexadecimal, and character if > >> +@code{eval-expression-print-maximum-character} allows it). > > > > Please add a "see below" here, as the description of the variable is > > several dozens of lines farther. > > Right. Is it okay to have nested parentheses? Personally, I prefer to use commas in these cases: +(octal, hexadecimal, and character if +@code{eval-expression-print-maximum-character}, described below, allows it). Thanks, the new version is fine with me.