From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail From: Eli Zaretskii Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Licence of ts-comint Date: Mon, 14 Aug 2017 05:35:14 +0300 Message-ID: <83zib2ho65.fsf@gnu.org> References: <1502621936.3273210.1071832168.58C017A8@webmail.messagingengine.com> Reply-To: Eli Zaretskii NNTP-Posting-Host: blaine.gmane.org X-Trace: blaine.gmane.org 1502678176 21428 195.159.176.226 (14 Aug 2017 02:36:16 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@blaine.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Mon, 14 Aug 2017 02:36:16 +0000 (UTC) Cc: monnier@iro.umontreal.ca, emacs-devel@gnu.org To: John Wiegley Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Mon Aug 14 04:36:08 2017 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by blaine.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1dh5Eb-0004xm-5O for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Mon, 14 Aug 2017 04:36:05 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:35455 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1dh5Eh-00065n-AW for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Sun, 13 Aug 2017 22:36:11 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:58047) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1dh5Dx-00064o-3B for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 13 Aug 2017 22:35:25 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1dh5Ds-0003a7-J6 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 13 Aug 2017 22:35:25 -0400 Original-Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::e]:48321) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1dh5Ds-0003Zs-FR; Sun, 13 Aug 2017 22:35:20 -0400 Original-Received: from 84.94.185.246.cable.012.net.il ([84.94.185.246]:4039 helo=home-c4e4a596f7) by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.2:RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:256) (Exim 4.82) (envelope-from ) id 1dh5Dr-0004tY-Sz; Sun, 13 Aug 2017 22:35:20 -0400 In-reply-to: (message from John Wiegley on Sun, 13 Aug 2017 16:35:14 -0700) X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] X-Received-From: 2001:4830:134:3::e X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.21 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "Emacs-devel" Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:217532 Archived-At: > From: John Wiegley > Date: Sun, 13 Aug 2017 16:35:14 -0700 > Cc: emacs-devel@gnu.org > > >>>>> "SM" == Stefan Monnier writes: > > SM> I don't know what is the current maintainers's opinion about include > SM> support for LLVM/LLDB/... into Emacs. I'm personally have no issue with > SM> it. > > I have no issue with it, either. I think allowing Emacs to interoperate with > other systems extends its reach, which in the end is more helpful, than shying > from the possibility that someone might then prefer to use LLDB over GDB. I > prefer to let the programmer use what he wants to use with Emacs. I prefer to wait until LLDB implements a decent emulation of the MI protocol, then we don't have to do anything to support it. GUD is the obsolescent interface, modern debugging should use MI.