From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail From: Eli Zaretskii Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Suspicious warning in W64 build Date: Sun, 17 Sep 2017 20:14:30 +0300 Message-ID: <83zi9ti6x5.fsf@gnu.org> References: <1017454172.910810.1504618695244@mail.libero.it> <837ex9x7vf.fsf@gnu.org> <83tw0cwcle.fsf@gnu.org> <83h8wcw3td.fsf@gnu.org> <83377vx3d0.fsf@gnu.org> <83ingnq01t.fsf@gnu.org> <83fubrpxsv.fsf@gnu.org> <83r2v9masw.fsf@gnu.org> <86a81xrndl.fsf@gmail.com> <83a81wmijy.fsf@gnu.org> <83vakkklto.fsf@gnu.org> <83poarlrcj.fsf@gnu.org> <83h8w3krx1.fsf@gnu.org> <83bmm9jt23.fsf@gnu.org> <0feb1250-beb8-5a21-0582-c879f922bb1c@cs.ucla.edu> Reply-To: Eli Zaretskii NNTP-Posting-Host: blaine.gmane.org X-Trace: blaine.gmane.org 1505668485 26738 195.159.176.226 (17 Sep 2017 17:14:45 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@blaine.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Sun, 17 Sep 2017 17:14:45 +0000 (UTC) Cc: fabrice.popineau@centralesupelec.fr, andrewjmoreton@gmail.com, emacs-devel@gnu.org To: Paul Eggert Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sun Sep 17 19:14:38 2017 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by blaine.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1dtd9S-0006gN-5j for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Sun, 17 Sep 2017 19:14:38 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:33081 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1dtd9Z-0005Rf-CD for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Sun, 17 Sep 2017 13:14:45 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:44647) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1dtd9O-0005RI-Qz for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 17 Sep 2017 13:14:39 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1dtd9J-0005Cv-Po for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 17 Sep 2017 13:14:34 -0400 Original-Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::e]:56784) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1dtd9J-0005Ch-Ku; Sun, 17 Sep 2017 13:14:29 -0400 Original-Received: from 84.94.185.246.cable.012.net.il ([84.94.185.246]:3796 helo=home-c4e4a596f7) by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.2:RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:256) (Exim 4.82) (envelope-from ) id 1dtd9I-0008Ia-6s; Sun, 17 Sep 2017 13:14:29 -0400 In-reply-to: <0feb1250-beb8-5a21-0582-c879f922bb1c@cs.ucla.edu> (message from Paul Eggert on Sun, 17 Sep 2017 10:07:42 -0700) X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] X-Received-From: 2001:4830:134:3::e X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.21 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "Emacs-devel" Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:218416 Archived-At: > Cc: fabrice.popineau@centralesupelec.fr, andrewjmoreton@gmail.com, > emacs-devel@gnu.org > From: Paul Eggert > Date: Sun, 17 Sep 2017 10:07:42 -0700 > > Although args[0] stops GCC from complaining, it is less useful than UNINIT > because it will make cleanup more difficult in the future. I don't see it that way, but these are minor stylistic differences of opinion that we don't have to agree about.