From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail From: Eli Zaretskii Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#29597: 26.0.90; line-number-display-width returns incorrect width Date: Fri, 08 Dec 2017 18:29:04 +0200 Message-ID: <83zi6tuqsv.fsf@gnu.org> References: <1512624891.1385920.1196858744.3908725A@webmail.messagingengine.com> <1512697446.3649570.1197990904.2822A9C1@webmail.messagingengine.com> <87d13qf07e.fsf@users.sourceforge.net> <1512700351.3662600.1198017792.20921918@webmail.messagingengine.com> <838tedw9el.fsf@gnu.org> <831sk5w6xb.fsf@gnu.org> Reply-To: Eli Zaretskii NNTP-Posting-Host: blaine.gmane.org X-Trace: blaine.gmane.org 1512750620 3745 195.159.176.226 (8 Dec 2017 16:30:20 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@blaine.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Fri, 8 Dec 2017 16:30:20 +0000 (UTC) Cc: hello@paulwrankin.com, 29597@debbugs.gnu.org To: Noam Postavsky Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Fri Dec 08 17:30:15 2017 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by blaine.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1eNLXS-0000nH-Ki for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Fri, 08 Dec 2017 17:30:14 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:38057 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1eNLXY-0007I6-2B for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Fri, 08 Dec 2017 11:30:20 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:49262) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1eNLXN-0007Es-7a for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Fri, 08 Dec 2017 11:30:13 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1eNLXH-0006Hb-HC for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Fri, 08 Dec 2017 11:30:09 -0500 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.43]:44064) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:16) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1eNLXH-0006G6-Dr for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Fri, 08 Dec 2017 11:30:03 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1eNLXG-00039v-PR for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Fri, 08 Dec 2017 11:30:02 -0500 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: Eli Zaretskii Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Fri, 08 Dec 2017 16:30:02 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 29597 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs X-GNU-PR-Keywords: notabug Original-Received: via spool by 29597-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B29597.151275057712086 (code B ref 29597); Fri, 08 Dec 2017 16:30:02 +0000 Original-Received: (at 29597) by debbugs.gnu.org; 8 Dec 2017 16:29:37 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:52745 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1eNLWq-00038s-R9 for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 08 Dec 2017 11:29:36 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.92]:58099) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1eNLWp-00038e-7P for 29597@debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 08 Dec 2017 11:29:35 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1eNLWg-0005w5-N5 for 29597@debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 08 Dec 2017 11:29:29 -0500 Original-Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::e]:41355) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1eNLWg-0005w1-Jk; Fri, 08 Dec 2017 11:29:26 -0500 Original-Received: from [176.228.60.248] (port=3446 helo=home-c4e4a596f7) by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.2:RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:256) (Exim 4.82) (envelope-from ) id 1eNLWf-0002xO-SE; Fri, 08 Dec 2017 11:29:26 -0500 In-reply-to: (message from Noam Postavsky on Fri, 8 Dec 2017 11:23:18 -0500) X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] X-Received-From: 208.118.235.43 X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "bug-gnu-emacs" Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.bugs:140825 Archived-At: > From: Noam Postavsky > Date: Fri, 8 Dec 2017 11:23:18 -0500 > Cc: Paul Rankin , 29597@debbugs.gnu.org > > > I don't object to such trivial wrappers, although I'd raise a brow if > > I saw something like this in Emacs. It sounds too trivial to have 2 > > more symbols in the name-space. But that's me. > > Is the symbol space really a scarce resource? Not really scarce, but do you really feel good with such trivial wrappers? Do we have anything similar anywhere else? Again, I won't fight this, I'm just saying it feels weird to me.