From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail From: Eli Zaretskii Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#31067: 27.0.50; After-string hidden by subsequent invisible text Date: Thu, 05 Apr 2018 16:38:05 +0300 Message-ID: <83zi2h22pu.fsf@gnu.org> References: <8360562db3.fsf@gnu.org> Reply-To: Eli Zaretskii NNTP-Posting-Host: blaine.gmane.org X-Trace: blaine.gmane.org 1522935430 4212 195.159.176.226 (5 Apr 2018 13:37:10 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@blaine.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Thu, 5 Apr 2018 13:37:10 +0000 (UTC) Cc: 31067@debbugs.gnu.org To: Stefan Monnier Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Thu Apr 05 15:37:06 2018 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by blaine.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1f454b-0000za-9v for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Thu, 05 Apr 2018 15:37:05 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:58496 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1f456g-0001d9-Sn for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Thu, 05 Apr 2018 09:39:14 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:37003) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1f456a-0001cu-M3 for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Thu, 05 Apr 2018 09:39:09 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1f456W-0003lZ-IH for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Thu, 05 Apr 2018 09:39:08 -0400 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.43]:59383) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:16) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1f456W-0003lT-5S for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Thu, 05 Apr 2018 09:39:04 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1f456T-0002vH-Ny for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Thu, 05 Apr 2018 09:39:03 -0400 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: Eli Zaretskii Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Thu, 05 Apr 2018 13:39:01 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 31067 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs X-GNU-PR-Keywords: Original-Received: via spool by 31067-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B31067.152293548511168 (code B ref 31067); Thu, 05 Apr 2018 13:39:01 +0000 Original-Received: (at 31067) by debbugs.gnu.org; 5 Apr 2018 13:38:05 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:39047 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1f455Z-0002u4-Jo for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 05 Apr 2018 09:38:05 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.92]:45803) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1f455X-0002tY-Bw for 31067@debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 05 Apr 2018 09:38:03 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1f455M-0003T8-DM for 31067@debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 05 Apr 2018 09:37:56 -0400 Original-Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::e]:38807) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1f455M-0003T4-9a; Thu, 05 Apr 2018 09:37:52 -0400 Original-Received: from [176.228.60.248] (port=3037 helo=home-c4e4a596f7) by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.2:RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:256) (Exim 4.82) (envelope-from ) id 1f455L-0001m1-OM; Thu, 05 Apr 2018 09:37:52 -0400 In-reply-to: (message from Stefan Monnier on Thu, 05 Apr 2018 08:23:30 -0400) X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] X-Received-From: 208.118.235.43 X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "bug-gnu-emacs" Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.bugs:144924 Archived-At: > From: Stefan Monnier > Cc: 31067@debbugs.gnu.org > Date: Thu, 05 Apr 2018 08:23:30 -0400 > > > IOW, the question is what should happen when the end-point of the > > overlay with after-string is in invisible text? > > If some (or all) of the end of the overlay-with-after-string is made > invisible, then the situation is much less clear and I could see > arguments either way, but if I get to choose then I think it makes sense > to consider that the after string is "attached" to the end of the > overlay, i.e. if the end of the overlay is invisible then so is the > after-string. But that's exactly what happens in your original example. Btw, "some or all of the end" is a strange wording, because the end is a (dimensionless) point.