From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail From: Eli Zaretskii Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#33445: Say "U+1F52E" Date: Wed, 21 Nov 2018 12:59:44 +0200 Message-ID: <83zhu2hf1b.fsf@gnu.org> References: <838t1nhzd2.fsf@gnu.org> <20181121.064435.330967170186046743.wl@gnu.org> <834lcaixt0.fsf@gnu.org> <20181121.113658.1778636052081371268.wl@gnu.org> NNTP-Posting-Host: blaine.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Trace: blaine.gmane.org 1542797892 20419 195.159.176.226 (21 Nov 2018 10:58:12 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@blaine.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Wed, 21 Nov 2018 10:58:12 +0000 (UTC) Cc: 33445@debbugs.gnu.org, jidanni@jidanni.org To: Werner LEMBERG Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Wed Nov 21 11:58:07 2018 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by blaine.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1gPQCp-0005AM-SH for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Wed, 21 Nov 2018 11:58:03 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:38326 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1gPQEw-0001In-Gq for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Wed, 21 Nov 2018 06:00:14 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:40578) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1gPQEp-0001HP-IN for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Wed, 21 Nov 2018 06:00:09 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1gPQEm-0008KD-Dg for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Wed, 21 Nov 2018 06:00:07 -0500 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.43]:33597) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:16) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1gPQEk-0008HE-Q6 for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Wed, 21 Nov 2018 06:00:04 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1gPQEk-0007qF-Nn for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Wed, 21 Nov 2018 06:00:02 -0500 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: Eli Zaretskii Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Wed, 21 Nov 2018 11:00:02 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 33445 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs X-GNU-PR-Keywords: wontfix Original-Received: via spool by 33445-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B33445.154279798730091 (code B ref 33445); Wed, 21 Nov 2018 11:00:02 +0000 Original-Received: (at 33445) by debbugs.gnu.org; 21 Nov 2018 10:59:47 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:37855 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1gPQEV-0007pH-7O for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 21 Nov 2018 05:59:47 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.92]:59079) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1gPQET-0007p3-9a for 33445@debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 21 Nov 2018 05:59:45 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1gPQEN-0007vA-9C for 33445@debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 21 Nov 2018 05:59:39 -0500 Original-Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::e]:44442) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1gPQEI-0007st-PZ; Wed, 21 Nov 2018 05:59:34 -0500 Original-Received: from [176.228.60.248] (port=2461 helo=home-c4e4a596f7) by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.2:RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:256) (Exim 4.82) (envelope-from ) id 1gPQEI-0003Of-CF; Wed, 21 Nov 2018 05:59:34 -0500 In-reply-to: <20181121.113658.1778636052081371268.wl@gnu.org> (message from Werner LEMBERG on Wed, 21 Nov 2018 11:36:58 +0100 (CET)) X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] X-Received-From: 208.118.235.43 X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "bug-gnu-emacs" Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.bugs:152629 Archived-At: > Date: Wed, 21 Nov 2018 11:36:58 +0100 (CET) > Cc: jidanni@jidanni.org, 33445@debbugs.gnu.org > From: Werner LEMBERG > > > position: 588 of 1015 (58%), column: 2 > > character: 🔮 (displayed as 🔮) (codepoint 128302, #o372456, #x1f52e) > > Is this `codepoint' ever different to the value shown two rows later? For characters from other charsets, yes. > > preferred charset: unicode (Unicode (ISO10646)) > > code point in charset: 0x1F52E > > This could be > > code point in charset: U+1F52E > > by special-casing Unicode, contrary to other charsets. What would be the utility of U+ for Emacs users? It just makes this more confusing for people who aren't familiar with the U+nnnn notation (which obviously excludes me, you, and the OP). Emacs doesn't accept that notation in any input mode, and never displays it. But I'm beginning to repeat myself, so I will shut up on this from now on.