From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Eli Zaretskii Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#35499: 27; lisp/font-lock.el - font-lock-maximum-size obsolete since 24.1 Date: Fri, 03 May 2019 12:27:53 +0300 Message-ID: <83zho3nazq.fsf@gnu.org> References: <80F2C0A3-C2CD-4B10-BA15-08E26BCAE211@scratch.space> Injection-Info: blaine.gmane.org; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:195.159.176.226"; logging-data="23911"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@blaine.gmane.org" Cc: 35499@debbugs.gnu.org To: Van L Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Fri May 03 23:19:43 2019 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by blaine.gmane.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:256) (Exim 4.89) (envelope-from ) id 1hMfao-0012u5-UJ for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Fri, 03 May 2019 23:19:43 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:37142 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1hMUVD-0005Ia-Vr for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Fri, 03 May 2019 05:29:12 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.92]:38247) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1hMUV6-0005IR-Ud for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Fri, 03 May 2019 05:29:05 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1hMUV6-0003ZK-4l for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Fri, 03 May 2019 05:29:04 -0400 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.43]:34194) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:16) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1hMUV4-0003XY-Cx for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Fri, 03 May 2019 05:29:02 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1hMUV4-0002q9-7j for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Fri, 03 May 2019 05:29:02 -0400 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: Eli Zaretskii Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Fri, 03 May 2019 09:29:02 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 35499 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs Original-Received: via spool by 35499-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B35499.155687570210874 (code B ref 35499); Fri, 03 May 2019 09:29:02 +0000 Original-Received: (at 35499) by debbugs.gnu.org; 3 May 2019 09:28:22 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:47738 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1hMUUQ-0002pF-84 for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 03 May 2019 05:28:22 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.92]:51972) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1hMUUN-0002ow-4z; Fri, 03 May 2019 05:28:19 -0400 Original-Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::e]:34354) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1hMUUG-0002rh-By; Fri, 03 May 2019 05:28:12 -0400 Original-Received: from [176.228.60.248] (port=1154 helo=home-c4e4a596f7) by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.2:RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:256) (Exim 4.82) (envelope-from ) id 1hMUUF-0000JM-9K; Fri, 03 May 2019 05:28:11 -0400 In-reply-to: <80F2C0A3-C2CD-4B10-BA15-08E26BCAE211@scratch.space> (message from Van L on Tue, 30 Apr 2019 11:58:05 +1000) X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] X-Received-From: 209.51.188.43 X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "bug-gnu-emacs" Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.bugs:158715 Archived-At: tags 35499 notabug close 35499 thanks > From: Van L > Date: Tue, 30 Apr 2019 11:58:05 +1000 > > The commentary mentions this variable obsolete since 24.1 . That's fine for a commentary (as opposed to documentation). We should remove that when we remove the variable itself, not before. Thanks.