From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Eli Zaretskii Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#38561: 27.0.50; Feature request: expose buffer size setting for process filters Date: Sun, 22 Dec 2019 19:25:05 +0200 Message-ID: <83zhfkxoge.fsf@gnu.org> References: <83woaqysf2.fsf@gnu.org> <83mublzi2e.fsf@gnu.org> <83h81tzgca.fsf@gnu.org> Injection-Info: blaine.gmane.org; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:195.159.176.226"; logging-data="190547"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@blaine.gmane.org" Cc: 38561@debbugs.gnu.org, yyoncho@gmail.com To: Dmitry Gutov Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sun Dec 22 18:26:10 2019 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by blaine.gmane.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.89) (envelope-from ) id 1ij4zZ-000nLD-ID for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Sun, 22 Dec 2019 18:26:09 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:49596 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1ij4zY-0005El-Er for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Sun, 22 Dec 2019 12:26:08 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:54810) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1ij4zT-0005Ea-7q for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sun, 22 Dec 2019 12:26:04 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1ij4zS-0003g5-7J for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sun, 22 Dec 2019 12:26:03 -0500 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.43]:44227) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:16) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1ij4zS-0003fF-27 for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sun, 22 Dec 2019 12:26:02 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1ij4zR-00045g-UP for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sun, 22 Dec 2019 12:26:01 -0500 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: Eli Zaretskii Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Sun, 22 Dec 2019 17:26:01 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 38561 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs Original-Received: via spool by 38561-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B38561.157703554615695 (code B ref 38561); Sun, 22 Dec 2019 17:26:01 +0000 Original-Received: (at 38561) by debbugs.gnu.org; 22 Dec 2019 17:25:46 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:50199 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1ij4zB-000454-Lp for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Sun, 22 Dec 2019 12:25:45 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.92]:43587) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1ij4zA-00044q-2T for 38561@debbugs.gnu.org; Sun, 22 Dec 2019 12:25:44 -0500 Original-Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::e]:46048) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1ij4z4-00022k-F3; Sun, 22 Dec 2019 12:25:38 -0500 Original-Received: from [176.228.60.248] (port=2939 helo=home-c4e4a596f7) by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.2:RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:256) (Exim 4.82) (envelope-from ) id 1ij4yt-0004W1-E3; Sun, 22 Dec 2019 12:25:34 -0500 In-reply-to: (message from Dmitry Gutov on Sun, 22 Dec 2019 16:23:13 +0200) X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] X-Received-From: 209.51.188.43 X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "bug-gnu-emacs" Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.bugs:173645 Archived-At: > Cc: 38561@debbugs.gnu.org > From: Dmitry Gutov > Date: Sun, 22 Dec 2019 16:23:13 +0200 > > On 21.12.2019 20:25, Eli Zaretskii wrote: > > Btw, my assumption was that the value will have to be changed from > > default only in very rare situations. If this is not the case, we > > might indeed want that to be a parameter at process creation time (I > > don't think we have process-local variables, do we?). > > Could the process use the buffer-local value of this variable? It didn't work for Ivan, I'm not yet sure why. Feel free to investigate. > Or, alternatively, use the value this variable had at the point of > process's creation. Then the caller could just temporarily bind it. That's impossible without saving the value in the process object.