From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.io!.POSTED.ciao.gmane.io!not-for-mail From: Eli Zaretskii Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: GNU ELPA package discoverability Date: Wed, 27 May 2020 18:45:25 +0300 Message-ID: <83zh9ts7oq.fsf@gnu.org> References: <35DBF02E-44D7-41E5-A217-7D6EC84ED221@icloud.com> <4e937898-ae46-710a-cbca-e452a1156fa1@yandex.ru> <2e630dc7-ba1d-e4c9-74b3-4da976db1e82@yandex.ru> <83blmdxus4.fsf@gnu.org> <831rn8vy6o.fsf@gnu.org> <83lflevju7.fsf@gnu.org> <83eer6t80v.fsf@gnu.org> Injection-Info: ciao.gmane.io; posting-host="ciao.gmane.io:159.69.161.202"; logging-data="48783"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@ciao.gmane.io" Cc: rms@gnu.org, Emacs-devel@gnu.org To: Tim Cross Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Wed May 27 17:46:33 2020 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by ciao.gmane.io with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1jdyGG-000CaE-Ed for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org; Wed, 27 May 2020 17:46:32 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:41416 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1jdyGF-0006e7-7A for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org; Wed, 27 May 2020 11:46:31 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:52630) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1jdyFU-0006Bi-A4 for Emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 27 May 2020 11:45:44 -0400 Original-Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::e]:38560) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1jdyFU-0002M0-0p; Wed, 27 May 2020 11:45:44 -0400 Original-Received: from [176.228.60.248] (port=4443 helo=home-c4e4a596f7) by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.2:RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:256) (Exim 4.82) (envelope-from ) id 1jdyFL-0007ma-NH; Wed, 27 May 2020 11:45:37 -0400 In-Reply-To: (message from Tim Cross on Wed, 27 May 2020 15:39:49 +1000) X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.23 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "Emacs-devel" Xref: news.gmane.io gmane.emacs.devel:251508 Archived-At: > From: Tim Cross > Date: Wed, 27 May 2020 15:39:49 +1000 > Cc: Richard Stallman , Emacs developers > > I have been back through the archives back to mid April and cannot find anything that looks like a proposal. > There are numerous threads discussing why we have elpa, what conventions/rules should be enforced, > rationale for having elpa, etc, but nothing which comes to any conclusion or anything close to a proposal or > call for decisions or any other actions, like feedback or further suggestions. Either it has a non-obvious > subject or is much further back in time. The proposal was to split ELPA into two, either insided the single archive or make the second part be hosted on a different server.