From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.io!.POSTED.ciao.gmane.io!not-for-mail From: Eli Zaretskii Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#42064: 28.0.50; German "Sharp S" is capitalized inconsistenly Date: Fri, 26 Jun 2020 21:55:00 +0300 Message-ID: <83zh8pr723.fsf@gnu.org> References: <87pn9lu0ns.fsf@warpmail.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Injection-Info: ciao.gmane.io; posting-host="ciao.gmane.io:159.69.161.202"; logging-data="108654"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@ciao.gmane.io" Cc: 42064@debbugs.gnu.org To: "Philip K." Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Fri Jun 26 20:56:10 2020 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by ciao.gmane.io with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1jotWD-000S7H-Gu for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org; Fri, 26 Jun 2020 20:56:09 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:47836 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1jotWC-0005IO-02 for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org; Fri, 26 Jun 2020 14:56:08 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:37636) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1jotW6-0005IG-GB for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Fri, 26 Jun 2020 14:56:02 -0400 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.43]:59728) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_128_GCM_SHA256:128) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1jotW6-0008BZ-7F for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Fri, 26 Jun 2020 14:56:02 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1jotW6-0003Tw-5T for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Fri, 26 Jun 2020 14:56:02 -0400 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: Eli Zaretskii Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Fri, 26 Jun 2020 18:56:02 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 42064 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs Original-Received: via spool by 42064-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B42064.159319772713342 (code B ref 42064); Fri, 26 Jun 2020 18:56:02 +0000 Original-Received: (at 42064) by debbugs.gnu.org; 26 Jun 2020 18:55:27 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:43041 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1jotVX-0003T8-FB for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 26 Jun 2020 14:55:27 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.92]:51390) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1jotVT-0003Rw-GY for 42064@debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 26 Jun 2020 14:55:25 -0400 Original-Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::e]:44295) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1jotVO-0007k9-3g; Fri, 26 Jun 2020 14:55:18 -0400 Original-Received: from [176.228.60.248] (port=3603 helo=home-c4e4a596f7) by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.2:RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:256) (Exim 4.82) (envelope-from ) id 1jotVM-0008Eh-IL; Fri, 26 Jun 2020 14:55:17 -0400 In-Reply-To: <87pn9lu0ns.fsf@warpmail.net> (philip@warpmail.net) X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "bug-gnu-emacs" Xref: news.gmane.io gmane.emacs.bugs:182417 Archived-At: > From: "Philip K." > Date: Fri, 26 Jun 2020 20:44:55 +0200 > > The german "Sharp S" (ß), seems to be capitalized inconsistenly, > depending on the system: > > - The german postfix input method, typing "SZ" inserts "ẞ" > - If a buffer already contains a "ß", running upcase-dwim generates > "SS". Lowercasing this results in "ss" unsurprisingly, while "ẞ" > generates "ß". > > Both behaviours are fine in their own right, but don't seem to make a > lot of sense together. Do you have a proposal for how to improve this? The problem, AFAIU, is that there are different preference, each one of which is legitimate, so the only way forward, it seems, is to introduce some user options to select the desired behavior.