From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.io!.POSTED.ciao.gmane.io!not-for-mail From: Eli Zaretskii Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#41473: Not saving all user options Date: Sat, 27 Jun 2020 10:17:02 +0300 Message-ID: <83zh8p2d1t.fsf@gnu.org> References: <87sgfrxekc.fsf@warpmail.net> <87ftahtx6w.fsf@warpmail.net> Injection-Info: ciao.gmane.io; posting-host="ciao.gmane.io:159.69.161.202"; logging-data="104254"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@ciao.gmane.io" Cc: npostavs@gmail.com, 41473@debbugs.gnu.org To: "Philip K." Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Sat Jun 27 09:18:31 2020 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by ciao.gmane.io with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1jp56c-000R0n-TR for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org; Sat, 27 Jun 2020 09:18:30 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:38854 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1jp56c-0003Cx-01 for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org; Sat, 27 Jun 2020 03:18:30 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:54882) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1jp56D-0002oB-GF for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sat, 27 Jun 2020 03:18:05 -0400 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.43]:60111) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_128_GCM_SHA256:128) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1jp56A-0006La-39 for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sat, 27 Jun 2020 03:18:03 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1jp569-0005d6-T5 for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sat, 27 Jun 2020 03:18:01 -0400 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: Eli Zaretskii Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Sat, 27 Jun 2020 07:18:01 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 41473 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs Original-Received: via spool by 41473-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B41473.159324224821586 (code B ref 41473); Sat, 27 Jun 2020 07:18:01 +0000 Original-Received: (at 41473) by debbugs.gnu.org; 27 Jun 2020 07:17:28 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:43424 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1jp55c-0005c6-Av for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Sat, 27 Jun 2020 03:17:28 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.92]:40116) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1jp55Y-0005bp-Fo for 41473@debbugs.gnu.org; Sat, 27 Jun 2020 03:17:27 -0400 Original-Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::e]:53748) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1jp55S-00069q-RC; Sat, 27 Jun 2020 03:17:18 -0400 Original-Received: from [176.228.60.248] (port=1772 helo=home-c4e4a596f7) by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.2:RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:256) (Exim 4.82) (envelope-from ) id 1jp55R-0002yz-6h; Sat, 27 Jun 2020 03:17:18 -0400 In-Reply-To: <87ftahtx6w.fsf@warpmail.net> (philip@warpmail.net) X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "bug-gnu-emacs" Xref: news.gmane.io gmane.emacs.bugs:182427 Archived-At: > From: "Philip K." > Date: Fri, 26 Jun 2020 21:59:51 +0200 > Cc: 41473@debbugs.gnu.org > > > I don't see any. Regarding your suggestions in particular, I think > > the plist method would be the cleanest. Four spaces strikes me as > > overly cryptic. > > The patch below should implement that behaviour. The property > "custom-inhibit-save" doesn't seem to be used anywhere else, so that > should be OK. Can we please go a step back, and discuss why such a feature would be needed? Your original report says you are annoyed, but provides no rationale and no real problems with the current behavior. Could you please elaborate on the nature of your annoyance? Thanks.