From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.io!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Eli Zaretskii Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#34476: fluffy whitespace in the mode-line, despite it running off the screen Date: Sat, 08 Aug 2020 13:01:15 +0300 Message-ID: <83zh755udw.fsf@gnu.org> References: <87lg2icx3u.fsf@jidanni.org> <87ftnfrwef.fsf@mouse.gnus.org> <87r26z0wdy.fsf@tcd.ie> <87eeoi7un0.fsf@gnus.org> <87a6z67t7p.fsf@gnus.org> <83364y8ze0.fsf@gnu.org> <878seq8yzo.fsf@gnus.org> <83y2mq7jk7.fsf@gnu.org> <87mu367iue.fsf@gnus.org> <83sgcy7ebz.fsf@gnu.org> <87wo295wob.fsf@gnus.org> <83364x79jl.fsf@gnu.org> Injection-Info: ciao.gmane.io; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:116.202.254.214"; logging-data="8532"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@ciao.gmane.io" Cc: contovob@tcd.ie, 34476@debbugs.gnu.org, jidanni@jidanni.org To: larsi@gnus.org Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Sat Aug 08 12:02:26 2020 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by ciao.gmane.io with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1k4LgI-00027n-2c for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org; Sat, 08 Aug 2020 12:02:26 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:43100 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1k4LgH-0002xm-4Z for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org; Sat, 08 Aug 2020 06:02:25 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:33672) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1k4Lfv-0002VK-4C for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sat, 08 Aug 2020 06:02:03 -0400 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.43]:46581) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_128_GCM_SHA256:128) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1k4Lfu-0005p8-Fd for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sat, 08 Aug 2020 06:02:02 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1k4Lfu-0006AS-9t; Sat, 08 Aug 2020 06:02:02 -0400 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: Eli Zaretskii Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org, bugs@gnus.org Resent-Date: Sat, 08 Aug 2020 10:02:02 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 34476 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs,gnus Original-Received: via spool by 34476-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B34476.159688088923662 (code B ref 34476); Sat, 08 Aug 2020 10:02:02 +0000 Original-Received: (at 34476) by debbugs.gnu.org; 8 Aug 2020 10:01:29 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:58126 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1k4LfN-00069Z-3z for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Sat, 08 Aug 2020 06:01:29 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.92]:51696) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1k4LfL-00069I-IH for 34476@debbugs.gnu.org; Sat, 08 Aug 2020 06:01:28 -0400 Original-Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::e]:44502) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1k4LfF-0005kV-DN; Sat, 08 Aug 2020 06:01:21 -0400 Original-Received: from [176.228.60.248] (port=1977 helo=home-c4e4a596f7) by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.2:RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:256) (Exim 4.82) (envelope-from ) id 1k4LfE-00089X-C9; Sat, 08 Aug 2020 06:01:21 -0400 In-Reply-To: <83364x79jl.fsf@gnu.org> (message from Eli Zaretskii on Sat, 08 Aug 2020 12:48:30 +0300) X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "bug-gnu-emacs" Xref: news.gmane.io gmane.emacs.bugs:184313 Archived-At: > Date: Sat, 08 Aug 2020 12:48:30 +0300 > From: Eli Zaretskii > Cc: contovob@tcd.ie, 34476@debbugs.gnu.org, jidanni@jidanni.org > > And I don't see why post-processing would be less efficient. Can you > explain why you think so? Should I perhaps post the post-processing code I had in mind?