From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.io!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Eli Zaretskii Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#44273: "total used in directory 19 available 5.2 GiB" Date: Thu, 29 Oct 2020 05:34:13 +0200 Message-ID: <83zh45bt8q.fsf@gnu.org> References: <87sg9zgchl.5.fsf@jidanni.org> <9FFBEBAF-FBB3-4AC9-950E-70B3927032F9@acm.org> <87h7qevdfc.fsf@gnus.org> <83pn52cr8x.fsf@gnu.org> <83eelicpee.fsf@gnu.org> Injection-Info: ciao.gmane.io; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:116.202.254.214"; logging-data="17953"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@ciao.gmane.io" Cc: mattiase@acm.org, larsi@gnus.org, jidanni@jidanni.org, 44273@debbugs.gnu.org To: Stefan Kangas Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Thu Oct 29 04:35:10 2020 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by ciao.gmane.io with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1kXyiT-0004ZE-U4 for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org; Thu, 29 Oct 2020 04:35:09 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:42356 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1kXyiT-0008PY-0o for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org; Wed, 28 Oct 2020 23:35:09 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:50614) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1kXyiM-0008PC-KG for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Wed, 28 Oct 2020 23:35:02 -0400 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.43]:39886) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_128_GCM_SHA256:128) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1kXyiM-0003Ha-9h for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Wed, 28 Oct 2020 23:35:02 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1kXyiM-0006Ad-6T for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Wed, 28 Oct 2020 23:35:02 -0400 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: Eli Zaretskii Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Thu, 29 Oct 2020 03:35:02 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 44273 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs X-GNU-PR-Keywords: wontfix patch Original-Received: via spool by 44273-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B44273.160394246723675 (code B ref 44273); Thu, 29 Oct 2020 03:35:02 +0000 Original-Received: (at 44273) by debbugs.gnu.org; 29 Oct 2020 03:34:27 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:51432 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1kXyhn-00069n-7w for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 28 Oct 2020 23:34:27 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.92]:50404) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1kXyhh-00069W-F4 for 44273@debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 28 Oct 2020 23:34:25 -0400 Original-Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::e]:32882) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1kXyhb-00030I-IV; Wed, 28 Oct 2020 23:34:15 -0400 Original-Received: from [176.228.60.248] (port=4414 helo=home-c4e4a596f7) by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.2:RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:256) (Exim 4.82) (envelope-from ) id 1kXyha-0004Uo-JN; Wed, 28 Oct 2020 23:34:14 -0400 In-Reply-To: (message from Stefan Kangas on Wed, 28 Oct 2020 17:03:56 -0700) X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "bug-gnu-emacs" Xref: news.gmane.io gmane.emacs.bugs:191934 Archived-At: > From: Stefan Kangas > Date: Wed, 28 Oct 2020 17:03:56 -0700 > Cc: larsi@gnus.org, mattiase@acm.org, jidanni@jidanni.org, > 44273@debbugs.gnu.org > > Eli Zaretskii writes: > > >> > Why don't you ask the Coreutils developers to remove that from 'ls' > >> > display as well, then? > >> > >> I believe this line is mandated by POSIX. > > > > Does POSIX mandate what 'ls' outputs when invoked with the --dired > > switch? > > Sorry, I didn't realize you were referring to that flag. (But maybe I > should have...) > > I don't think POSIX says anything about the --dired flag. It's a GNU > extension. So then GNU 'ls' could do anything Emacs needs when 'ls' is invoked with --dired, including removing that line.