From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.io!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Eli Zaretskii Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#46256: [feature/native-comp] AOT eln files ignored if run from build tree Date: Sat, 06 Mar 2021 09:42:55 +0200 Message-ID: <83zgzgwww0.fsf@gnu.org> References: <865z38a9vo.fsf@gmail.com> <86eehujcip.fsf@gmail.com> <86blch14qt.fsf@gmail.com> <83h7m84h9g.fsf@gnu.org> <86v9ao5czu.fsf@gmail.com> <86wnutogrh.fsf@gmail.com> <86wnut8fb9.fsf@gmail.com> <861rd1tbpa.fsf@gmail.com> <83pn0km6y3.fsf@gnu.org> <86ft1f8ara.fsf@gmail.com> <83sg5cjdn8.fsf@gnu.org> <83r1kwjcy2.fsf@gnu.org> <83k0qoj9zv.fsf@gnu.org> <83im68j963.fsf@gnu.org> <861rct5dfd.fsf@gmail.com> Injection-Info: ciao.gmane.io; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:116.202.254.214"; logging-data="19856"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@ciao.gmane.io" Cc: 46256@debbugs.gnu.org To: Andy Moreton Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Sat Mar 06 08:44:29 2021 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by ciao.gmane.io with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1lIRbx-000554-7C for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org; Sat, 06 Mar 2021 08:44:29 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:57044 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1lIRbw-00017I-8C for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org; Sat, 06 Mar 2021 02:44:28 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:45376) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1lIRbW-00016n-Pt for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sat, 06 Mar 2021 02:44:04 -0500 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.43]:52605) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_128_GCM_SHA256:128) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1lIRbW-00077I-J0 for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sat, 06 Mar 2021 02:44:02 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1lIRbW-0004t7-H9 for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sat, 06 Mar 2021 02:44:02 -0500 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: Eli Zaretskii Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Sat, 06 Mar 2021 07:44:02 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 46256 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs Original-Received: via spool by 46256-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B46256.161501659518727 (code B ref 46256); Sat, 06 Mar 2021 07:44:02 +0000 Original-Received: (at 46256) by debbugs.gnu.org; 6 Mar 2021 07:43:15 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:35918 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1lIRal-0004ry-6y for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Sat, 06 Mar 2021 02:43:15 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.92]:55648) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1lIRaj-0004rm-N5 for 46256@debbugs.gnu.org; Sat, 06 Mar 2021 02:43:13 -0500 Original-Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::e]:34677) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1lIRae-0006cX-6s; Sat, 06 Mar 2021 02:43:08 -0500 Original-Received: from 84.94.185.95.cable.012.net.il ([84.94.185.95]:2639 helo=home-c4e4a596f7) by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.2:RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:256) (Exim 4.82) (envelope-from ) id 1lIRad-0002XN-Ef; Sat, 06 Mar 2021 02:43:07 -0500 In-Reply-To: <861rct5dfd.fsf@gmail.com> (message from Andy Moreton on Sat, 06 Mar 2021 00:33:10 +0000) X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "bug-gnu-emacs" Xref: news.gmane.io gmane.emacs.bugs:201597 Archived-At: > From: Andy Moreton > Date: Sat, 06 Mar 2021 00:33:10 +0000 > > > This is a conservative choice, we may want to look only at > > '--with-wide-int' but I'm wondering if that's really the only sensitive > > input therefore having `system-configuration-options' in the equation > > looked safer to me at least for now. > > I agree that it is a conservative choice, but that still misses features > that are enabled/disabled by default in the configury. > > Thus the ABI hash should also include `system-configuration-features'. Which of the features you think might affect the ABI? I reviewed them a couple of days ago and didn't find any I could convince myself should affect that, but maybe I missed something. Or maybe we should ask Andrea to try to provide a more detailed definition of what exactly constitutes the "ABI" in this case.