From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.io!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Eli Zaretskii Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: [External] : Re: Change default behavior of some commands that act on region? Date: Sun, 23 May 2021 21:08:18 +0300 Message-ID: <83zgwliar1.fsf@gnu.org> References: <83im3aj6ns.fsf@gnu.org> <8335udjxeh.fsf@gnu.org> Injection-Info: ciao.gmane.io; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:116.202.254.214"; logging-data="17496"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@ciao.gmane.io" Cc: monnier@iro.umontreal.ca, emacs-devel@gnu.org To: Drew Adams Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Sun May 23 20:08:50 2021 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by ciao.gmane.io with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1lksWw-0004NG-GF for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org; Sun, 23 May 2021 20:08:50 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:57740 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1lksWv-0007kJ-JA for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org; Sun, 23 May 2021 14:08:49 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:57096) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1lksWR-00074f-Iq for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 23 May 2021 14:08:19 -0400 Original-Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::e]:39094) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1lksWR-0005o0-54; Sun, 23 May 2021 14:08:19 -0400 Original-Received: from 84.94.185.95.cable.012.net.il ([84.94.185.95]:3733 helo=home-c4e4a596f7) by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1lksWQ-0001EG-84; Sun, 23 May 2021 14:08:18 -0400 In-Reply-To: (message from Drew Adams on Sun, 23 May 2021 17:50:39 +0000) X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.23 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "Emacs-devel" Xref: news.gmane.io gmane.emacs.devel:269686 Archived-At: > From: Drew Adams > CC: "monnier@iro.umontreal.ca" , > "emacs-devel@gnu.org" > Date: Sun, 23 May 2021 17:50:39 +0000 > > By that second line, I meant that there are many commands > that don't take t-m-m into account. And rightfully so. At least most of them. To say that they do that because they haven't "awakened" to transient-mark-mode is a misrepresentation that hints at the Emacs developers' being obtuse or worse. You have no basis for such accusations, so don't. > Would you argue that there are _no_ such commands that could benefit > from considering the t-m-m ON case? That's a far cry from what you actually wrote, to what I responded. I will take this as an apology.