From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.io!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Eli Zaretskii Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#44503: 27.1; image-scroll-up and image-scroll-down Date: Thu, 10 Jun 2021 17:24:02 +0300 Message-ID: <83zgvxbxx9.fsf@gnu.org> References: <47686.12087.468202.24486@gargle.gargle.HOWL> <835z6h6ved.fsf@gnu.org> <41096.42019.863060.24489@gargle.gargle.HOWL> <87mts3s2ho.fsf@gnus.org> <36339.58287.924793.24767@gargle.gargle.HOWL> <8735trmkdl.fsf@gnus.org> <835yyndznw.fsf@gnu.org> <87bl8eb07s.fsf@gnus.org> <871r99c25e.fsf@gnus.org> Injection-Info: ciao.gmane.io; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:116.202.254.214"; logging-data="1255"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@ciao.gmane.io" Cc: 44503@debbugs.gnu.org, winkler@gnu.org To: Lars Ingebrigtsen Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Thu Jun 10 16:25:15 2021 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by ciao.gmane.io with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1lrLcR-000Ae6-Bq for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org; Thu, 10 Jun 2021 16:25:15 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:58144 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1lrLcQ-0001wu-AJ for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org; Thu, 10 Jun 2021 10:25:14 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:59908) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1lrLcE-0001h4-6Z for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Thu, 10 Jun 2021 10:25:02 -0400 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.43]:54204) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_128_GCM_SHA256:128) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1lrLcD-0003yX-Vn for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Thu, 10 Jun 2021 10:25:01 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1lrLcD-0008P8-QF for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Thu, 10 Jun 2021 10:25:01 -0400 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: Eli Zaretskii Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Thu, 10 Jun 2021 14:25:01 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 44503 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs Original-Received: via spool by 44503-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B44503.162333506332217 (code B ref 44503); Thu, 10 Jun 2021 14:25:01 +0000 Original-Received: (at 44503) by debbugs.gnu.org; 10 Jun 2021 14:24:23 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:37517 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1lrLbb-0008NZ-7a for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 10 Jun 2021 10:24:23 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.92]:33772) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1lrLbY-0008NI-T8 for 44503@debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 10 Jun 2021 10:24:21 -0400 Original-Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::e]:52370) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1lrLbT-0003VS-Hb; Thu, 10 Jun 2021 10:24:15 -0400 Original-Received: from 84.94.185.95.cable.012.net.il ([84.94.185.95]:4505 helo=home-c4e4a596f7) by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1lrLbT-000561-3b; Thu, 10 Jun 2021 10:24:15 -0400 In-Reply-To: <871r99c25e.fsf@gnus.org> (message from Lars Ingebrigtsen on Thu, 10 Jun 2021 14:52:45 +0200) X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "bug-gnu-emacs" Xref: news.gmane.io gmane.emacs.bugs:208322 Archived-At: > From: Lars Ingebrigtsen > Cc: 44503@debbugs.gnu.org, winkler@gnu.org > Date: Thu, 10 Jun 2021 14:52:45 +0200 > > Lars Ingebrigtsen writes: > > >> What about the value of '-' ? > > > > Yes, `C-u -' here does the opposite of the non-prefixed action. (While > > it's indistinguishable from `C-u - 1' with normal "p" action.) > > Just a thought -- should we perhaps establish a convention for this that > we can say commands adhere to? That is, `C-u NUM' means "the same as > 'p'" while `C-u -' and no prefix means "some large (negative and > positive; depending on the command) amount"? I'm not sure how many of > these commands we have... I'm not sure I follow: what are you trying to improve/fix/change by that, apart of the doc strings?