From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.io!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Eli Zaretskii Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Using Emacs in fbterm. Date: Mon, 29 Aug 2022 22:42:15 +0300 Message-ID: <83zgfmvnu0.fsf@gnu.org> References: <83czcjvtt2.fsf@gnu.org> <835yiax4ea.fsf@gnu.org> Injection-Info: ciao.gmane.io; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:116.202.254.214"; logging-data="27141"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@ciao.gmane.io" Cc: acm@muc.de, emacs-devel@gnu.org To: Gregory Heytings Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Mon Aug 29 21:42:51 2022 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by ciao.gmane.io with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1oSkeo-0006u3-Jx for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org; Mon, 29 Aug 2022 21:42:50 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:51562 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1oSken-0007Wp-9J for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org; Mon, 29 Aug 2022 15:42:49 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:59330) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1oSkdw-0006af-Rf for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 29 Aug 2022 15:41:57 -0400 Original-Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::e]:59768) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1oSkdv-0000rh-Vb; Mon, 29 Aug 2022 15:41:56 -0400 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gnu.org; s=fencepost-gnu-org; h=References:Subject:In-Reply-To:To:From:Date: mime-version; bh=/JnjzlqQBU4T3ItnQ4Pj3SxHCOmrltcZXZijZsVWuKM=; b=admOajZn+nax BIpt3my/UlIMijRmO2KyXYKNMOIIcyFJ6B3sjir0ktWnrj8vBO9Nr6RT/8JpbPem/C9ZGzGvNW9/R eZhtgxkAtDkwOhrzNaFvblecVho9cs9Se/FnlolPt0pRD35QOdyAfBvg56ndBEaj5CazutQJL9pjL aVxIycDUtNNvS7ePaF885eSmmCuA9AqT/s9Gvy4PMSeDQ2taSvolRxU5w5c+emaj+DOBFCYjVYpfg X2Pd3EMmLDCgIK3itV+r/AkO3HexwvKkE9EnoXG+g0emwH64bRqTdQ5WajU9Sr+ZqNtPMeitLpUdb mizfaN5NxUfXzxWzc5kcIQ==; Original-Received: from [87.69.77.57] (port=4129 helo=home-c4e4a596f7) by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1oSkdt-0007Rw-Vi; Mon, 29 Aug 2022 15:41:55 -0400 In-Reply-To: (message from Gregory Heytings on Mon, 29 Aug 2022 19:29:32 +0000) X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "Emacs-devel" Xref: news.gmane.io gmane.emacs.devel:294305 Archived-At: > Date: Mon, 29 Aug 2022 19:29:32 +0000 > From: Gregory Heytings > cc: acm@muc.de, emacs-devel@gnu.org > > > What does the terminfo DB say about commands to set color on fbterm? > > > > Here's the comparison of the relevant entries between linux and fbterm. > I don't know where the fbterm entries come from, they seem to be based on > some patched version. Not surprisingly, the differences are in color commands.