From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.io!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Eli Zaretskii Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#58558: 29.0.50; re-search-forward is slow in some buffers Date: Tue, 13 Dec 2022 18:08:56 +0200 Message-ID: <83zgbrnv53.fsf@gnu.org> References: <877d10r21x.fsf@localhost> <87zgdwyvkt.fsf@gnus.org> <87ilkk6ri5.fsf@localhost> <87v8okjei9.fsf@gnus.org> <87tu44jdce.fsf@localhost> <87czasjd9j.fsf@gnus.org> <87k050nio5.fsf@localhost> <87zgdwhw0z.fsf@gnus.org> <83sfjo3tfw.fsf@gnu.org> <878rlfjmjh.fsf@localhost> <87mt9tbbbp.fsf@gnus.org> <8335bl18lo.fsf@gnu.org> <87wn8x9eqb.fsf@gnus.org> <87tu1zd2c6.fsf@localhost> <83h6xzphxm.fsf@gnu.org> <87wn6vbfaa.fsf@localhost> <838rjbpecw.fsf@gnu.org> <87fsdjwb4e.fsf@localhost> Injection-Info: ciao.gmane.io; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:116.202.254.214"; logging-data="14382"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@ciao.gmane.io" Cc: 58558@debbugs.gnu.org, larsi@gnus.org, monnier@iro.umontreal.ca To: Ihor Radchenko Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Tue Dec 13 17:10:30 2022 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by ciao.gmane.io with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1p57rS-0003WQ-AG for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org; Tue, 13 Dec 2022 17:10:30 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1] helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1p57rE-000769-Al; Tue, 13 Dec 2022 11:10:17 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1p57r0-00071e-PI for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Tue, 13 Dec 2022 11:10:04 -0500 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.43]) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_128_GCM_SHA256:128) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1p57r0-0008Jh-GX for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Tue, 13 Dec 2022 11:10:02 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1p57qz-0005kJ-W5 for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Tue, 13 Dec 2022 11:10:02 -0500 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: Eli Zaretskii Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Tue, 13 Dec 2022 16:10:01 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 58558 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs Original-Received: via spool by 58558-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B58558.167094774222061 (code B ref 58558); Tue, 13 Dec 2022 16:10:01 +0000 Original-Received: (at 58558) by debbugs.gnu.org; 13 Dec 2022 16:09:02 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:33031 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1p57q1-0005jY-7U for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 13 Dec 2022 11:09:02 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.92]:48134) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1p57pz-0005jL-3b for 58558@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 13 Dec 2022 11:08:59 -0500 Original-Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::e]) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1p57pt-0007GD-29; Tue, 13 Dec 2022 11:08:53 -0500 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gnu.org; s=fencepost-gnu-org; h=References:Subject:In-Reply-To:To:From:Date: mime-version; bh=NjqV095xFQPxSkx77Y9pQV9WUSDzXXsyMFn/Q2zzfj0=; b=jt9eweHYTtYh +DWdGy7yBem5rmBsSwOuWSpHW/KENny7nS9AFsaj1RS6HALXhVeJjT1hwOs5FC3syCBsePY7uPaiP 6LqsQEtWtM+6F/XiRxwD/3pAT8PtYjpnPZXhk68GpPsM9+IKe0SpDDUrQSKiBinFJ2CQyUk4hKXnf aFR9f/pZf4lN8vcj+/NIAh2xD6h9w1F1o9X3PjcLTDQIOHHYDb1PCbW8gyiyVfx+1O0QKURaC/krd Zcj4i0Bv+cUOQfEWF9i3oQIk1PRIaf7nnZ1p6KJRd+AaANR/SQEkmeC8AOEJigI9ncS/YdU3DBK4L gSrhfZYstQWULRYFiUbLFQ==; Original-Received: from [87.69.77.57] (helo=home-c4e4a596f7) by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1p57ps-0007vW-GW; Tue, 13 Dec 2022 11:08:52 -0500 In-Reply-To: <87fsdjwb4e.fsf@localhost> (message from Ihor Radchenko on Tue, 13 Dec 2022 15:56:33 +0000) X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.io gmane.emacs.bugs:250854 Archived-At: > From: Ihor Radchenko > Cc: larsi@gnus.org, monnier@iro.umontreal.ca, 58558@debbugs.gnu.org > Date: Tue, 13 Dec 2022 15:56:33 +0000 > > My guess: number of markers is growing somehow? That was my guess, yeah. So now the question becomes: who creates all those additional markers if all you do is run the benchmark? If no other idea to find this out comes up, maybe run this with a breakpoint in make-marker, look at the backtrace to see the callers.