From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.io!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Eli Zaretskii Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: New Package for NonGNU-ELPA: clojure-ts-mode Date: Sun, 13 Aug 2023 17:13:13 +0300 Message-ID: <83zg2vav46.fsf@gnu.org> References: <87il9kksqz.fsf@dfreeman.email> <87a5uw9ivs.fsf@posteo.net> <87ttt42gna.fsf@dfreeman.email> <87wmy080kn.fsf@posteo.net> <83v8djcydl.fsf@gnu.org> <87350ndquw.fsf@dfreeman.email> <83350ncbns.fsf@gnu.org> <87cyzrjbd8.fsf@dfreeman.email> Injection-Info: ciao.gmane.io; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:116.202.254.214"; logging-data="31902"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@ciao.gmane.io" Cc: philipk@posteo.net, emacs-devel@gnu.org, manuel.uberti@inventati.org To: Danny Freeman Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Sun Aug 13 16:14:04 2023 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by ciao.gmane.io with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1qVBqz-0007zV-IE for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org; Sun, 13 Aug 2023 16:14:01 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1] helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1qVBqJ-00015W-KD; Sun, 13 Aug 2023 10:13:19 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1qVBqH-0000p5-B3 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 13 Aug 2023 10:13:17 -0400 Original-Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::e]) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1qVBqE-0000xX-Jh; Sun, 13 Aug 2023 10:13:14 -0400 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gnu.org; s=fencepost-gnu-org; h=References:Subject:In-Reply-To:To:From:Date: mime-version; bh=MTOxRAWys9Wt8U2AnbgEnwP4NzCWPdyMj+1iFWYmv28=; b=B1TohRq/E7ll DNjKNkm+ATAkqH1GKLhGCgosXNwrrXNbCsxOWRQG5riYUy5l4M3OzRbJoPPFvsc6up/WSUB+DNklj 27ugHDlrcsucB5TnhHSLhy85ROHTeC+p06JFI7x2aajYDAJEMuW7im7syzb4YZ2ak1tS2G58MIr/I x44Z2EmNojCxjXI21axBHCKApSpSLH2vgzYjeB0s6vak4JKWdBOGvUzCMu+Dnp432HRc1TWspZ7T8 IUsCVmCUStlvjw91O++P/7m5kRZXXq7JPm/MD2HifxY5KFoGFxb3fFHIzJc0HTy6Zt1HYPi6CZnTi RRHOrpdiu8CCWBBep+SYdQ==; In-Reply-To: <87cyzrjbd8.fsf@dfreeman.email> (message from Danny Freeman on Sun, 13 Aug 2023 09:35:36 -0400) X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.io gmane.emacs.devel:308678 Archived-At: > From: Danny Freeman > Cc: Danny Freeman , philipk@posteo.net, > emacs-devel@gnu.org, manuel.uberti@inventati.org > Date: Sun, 13 Aug 2023 09:35:36 -0400 > > > Eli Zaretskii writes: > > Don't agree because they oppose that as a matter of principle, or > > don't agree because they think it's too much work? > > A matter of principle. > > > I'm suggesting to look at the numbers and see who of the contributors > > really needs to sign the legal paperwork. The results might surprise > > us, but even if they don't, what possible harm could it do to collect > > those LOC counts for each contributor, so that we all are on the same > > page regarding the magnitude of the problem? > > > > Or let me turn the table ans ask: suppose no CA paperwork was needed: > > would they still oppose adding these modes to Emacs? > > Yes. I'm at a loss how people who develop an Emacs package can object to adding their package to Emacs. But so be it.