From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Eli Zaretskii Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Emacs pretest 23.1.92 Date: Sat, 30 Jan 2010 12:00:22 +0200 Message-ID: <83y6jfrjyh.fsf@gnu.org> References: <873a1o48sm.fsf@stupidchicken.com> Reply-To: Eli Zaretskii NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1264845727 22946 80.91.229.12 (30 Jan 2010 10:02:07 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Sat, 30 Jan 2010 10:02:07 +0000 (UTC) Cc: emacs-devel@gnu.org To: Leo Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sat Jan 30 11:02:04 2010 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1NbA9U-0002P4-6y for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Sat, 30 Jan 2010 11:02:04 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:38662 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1NbA9T-00011g-J6 for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Sat, 30 Jan 2010 05:02:03 -0500 Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1NbA8U-0000xl-U6 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 30 Jan 2010 05:01:02 -0500 Original-Received: from [199.232.76.173] (port=41919 helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1NbA8T-0000xM-M0 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 30 Jan 2010 05:01:01 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by monty-python.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1NbA8R-0005Uc-8T for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 30 Jan 2010 05:01:01 -0500 Original-Received: from mtaout23.012.net.il ([80.179.55.175]:34352) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1NbA8Q-0005US-TG for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 30 Jan 2010 05:00:59 -0500 Original-Received: from conversion-daemon.a-mtaout23.012.net.il by a-mtaout23.012.net.il (HyperSendmail v2007.08) id <0KX200K0004J4P00@a-mtaout23.012.net.il> for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 30 Jan 2010 12:00:20 +0200 (IST) Original-Received: from HOME-C4E4A596F7 ([77.127.180.161]) by a-mtaout23.012.net.il (HyperSendmail v2007.08) with ESMTPA id <0KX200IKE14J68B0@a-mtaout23.012.net.il>; Sat, 30 Jan 2010 12:00:20 +0200 (IST) In-reply-to: X-012-Sender: halo1@inter.net.il X-detected-operating-system: by monty-python.gnu.org: Solaris 10 (beta) X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:120679 Archived-At: > From: Leo > Date: Sat, 30 Jan 2010 08:50:17 +0000 > > On 2010-01-30 02:37 +0000, Chong Yidong wrote: > > ftp://alpha.gnu.org/gnu/emacs/pretest/emacs-23.1.92.tar.gz > > Any idea why this tarball contains the .elc files? ??? Emacs release tarballs _always_ contain the .elc files. The idea is that, since .elc files are architecture independent, there's no need to slow down installation by not including them, and nothing of significance to gain by such an omission. Why did you think there should be no .elc files?