From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Eli Zaretskii Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#6823: 24.0.50; Wdired or Dired enhancement Date: Mon, 09 Aug 2010 05:59:15 +0300 Message-ID: <83y6cgv6d8.fsf@gnu.org> References: Reply-To: Eli Zaretskii NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org X-Trace: dough.gmane.org 1281323341 20786 80.91.229.12 (9 Aug 2010 03:09:01 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@dough.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Mon, 9 Aug 2010 03:09:01 +0000 (UTC) Cc: 6823@debbugs.gnu.org To: Drew Adams Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Mon Aug 09 05:09:00 2010 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1OiIjO-0003VT-Or for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Mon, 09 Aug 2010 05:08:55 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:45420 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1OiIjO-0002Si-7n for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Sun, 08 Aug 2010 23:08:54 -0400 Original-Received: from [140.186.70.92] (port=33810 helo=eggs.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1OiIiw-0002Fo-Iq for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sun, 08 Aug 2010 23:08:27 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1OiIiv-0005hu-8j for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sun, 08 Aug 2010 23:08:26 -0400 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([140.186.70.43]:35041) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1OiIiv-0005ho-5y for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sun, 08 Aug 2010 23:08:25 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1OiIZp-0001mf-Tr; Sun, 08 Aug 2010 22:59:01 -0400 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: Eli Zaretskii Original-Sender: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Resent-To: owner@debbugs.gnu.org Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Mon, 09 Aug 2010 02:59:01 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 6823 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs X-GNU-PR-Keywords: Original-Received: via spool by 6823-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B6823.12813227176850 (code B ref 6823); Mon, 09 Aug 2010 02:59:01 +0000 Original-Received: (at 6823) by debbugs.gnu.org; 9 Aug 2010 02:58:37 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1OiIZR-0001mR-1a for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Sun, 08 Aug 2010 22:58:37 -0400 Original-Received: from mtaout21.012.net.il ([80.179.55.169]) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1OiIZO-0001mM-Cl for 6823@debbugs.gnu.org; Sun, 08 Aug 2010 22:58:35 -0400 Original-Received: from conversion-daemon.a-mtaout21.012.net.il by a-mtaout21.012.net.il (HyperSendmail v2007.08) id <0L6V008006S3HT00@a-mtaout21.012.net.il> for 6823@debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 09 Aug 2010 05:59:14 +0300 (IDT) Original-Received: from HOME-C4E4A596F7 ([77.126.102.143]) by a-mtaout21.012.net.il (HyperSendmail v2007.08) with ESMTPA id <0L6V007B66YPIBD0@a-mtaout21.012.net.il>; Mon, 09 Aug 2010 05:59:14 +0300 (IDT) In-reply-to: X-012-Sender: halo1@inter.net.il X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.11 Precedence: list Resent-Date: Sun, 08 Aug 2010 22:59:01 -0400 X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.6 (newer, 3) X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.bugs:39345 Archived-At: > From: "Drew Adams" > Date: Sat, 7 Aug 2010 11:37:43 -0700 > Cc: > > Emacs sorely needs one or more commands that let you rename the > marked files as a sequence (following a pattern). Doesn't the "% R" command in Dired use query-replace under the hood? If so, doesn't it already allow to include Lisp expressions in the replacement that are eval'ed?