From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Eli Zaretskii Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Proposed patch: allow user to disable lockfile creation Date: Sat, 30 Jul 2011 10:21:23 +0300 Message-ID: <83y5zgcjyk.fsf@gnu.org> References: <87ei1bqi8p.fsf@uwakimon.sk.tsukuba.ac.jp> Reply-To: Eli Zaretskii NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org X-Trace: dough.gmane.org 1312010538 12152 80.91.229.12 (30 Jul 2011 07:22:18 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@dough.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Sat, 30 Jul 2011 07:22:18 +0000 (UTC) Cc: rms@gnu.org, emacs-devel@gnu.org To: Dave Abrahams Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sat Jul 30 09:22:13 2011 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([140.186.70.17]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1Qn3sD-0003H0-MR for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Sat, 30 Jul 2011 09:22:13 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:46227 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Qn3sC-00087Z-Ox for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Sat, 30 Jul 2011 03:22:12 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([140.186.70.92]:45438) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Qn3sA-00087T-7s for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 30 Jul 2011 03:22:11 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Qn3s9-00011M-32 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 30 Jul 2011 03:22:10 -0400 Original-Received: from mtaout21.012.net.il ([80.179.55.169]:47885) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Qn3s8-00011I-RE; Sat, 30 Jul 2011 03:22:09 -0400 Original-Received: from conversion-daemon.a-mtaout21.012.net.il by a-mtaout21.012.net.il (HyperSendmail v2007.08) id <0LP400F00X6EIC00@a-mtaout21.012.net.il>; Sat, 30 Jul 2011 10:21:11 +0300 (IDT) Original-Received: from HOME-C4E4A596F7 ([84.228.48.51]) by a-mtaout21.012.net.il (HyperSendmail v2007.08) with ESMTPA id <0LP400FVIXRAJ100@a-mtaout21.012.net.il>; Sat, 30 Jul 2011 10:21:11 +0300 (IDT) In-reply-to: X-012-Sender: halo1@inter.net.il X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: Solaris 10 (beta) X-Received-From: 80.179.55.169 X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:142509 Archived-At: > From: Dave Abrahams > Date: Fri, 29 Jul 2011 23:29:38 -0400 > Cc: johnw@newartisans.com, theophilusx@gmail.com, lennart.borgman@gmail.com, > emacs-devel@gnu.org, schwab@linux-m68k.org, stephen@xemacs.org > > I'm sure that depends on your perspective about what's convenient. The > advance warning feature may be convenient for you, but for me (and > apparently I'm not alone) it's a nuisance. My patch simply allows > people to turn this feature off if they have the same experience as I > do. Is there some reason it can't be accepted? You can always disable this feature by removing the CLASH_DETECTION macro definition on the appropriate header file in src/s/, can't you?