From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Eli Zaretskii Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#10127: 24.0.91; wrong window width calc for `C-u C-x =' when *Help* in separate frame Date: Thu, 24 Nov 2011 20:49:38 +0200 Message-ID: <83y5v58if1.fsf@gnu.org> References: <33462449944A4AD488077588779E681E@us.oracle.com> Reply-To: Eli Zaretskii NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org X-Trace: dough.gmane.org 1322160640 1175 80.91.229.12 (24 Nov 2011 18:50:40 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@dough.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Thu, 24 Nov 2011 18:50:40 +0000 (UTC) Cc: 10127@debbugs.gnu.org To: Drew Adams Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Thu Nov 24 19:50:36 2011 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([140.186.70.17]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1RTeNV-0007GW-UY for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Thu, 24 Nov 2011 19:50:34 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:44544 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1RTeNV-0000fZ-I8 for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Thu, 24 Nov 2011 13:50:33 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([140.186.70.92]:35392) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1RTeNS-0000fO-1v for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Thu, 24 Nov 2011 13:50:31 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1RTeNR-000256-Dn for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Thu, 24 Nov 2011 13:50:30 -0500 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([140.186.70.43]:35861) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1RTeNR-000252-AN for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Thu, 24 Nov 2011 13:50:29 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1RTeOv-0005Op-Fe for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Thu, 24 Nov 2011 13:52:01 -0500 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: Eli Zaretskii Original-Sender: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Thu, 24 Nov 2011 18:52:01 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 10127 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs X-GNU-PR-Keywords: Original-Received: via spool by 10127-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B10127.132216067320694 (code B ref 10127); Thu, 24 Nov 2011 18:52:01 +0000 Original-Received: (at 10127) by debbugs.gnu.org; 24 Nov 2011 18:51:13 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1RTeO9-0005Nj-CB for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 24 Nov 2011 13:51:13 -0500 Original-Received: from mtaout20.012.net.il ([80.179.55.166]) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1RTeO7-0005NY-ID for 10127@debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 24 Nov 2011 13:51:12 -0500 Original-Received: from conversion-daemon.a-mtaout20.012.net.il by a-mtaout20.012.net.il (HyperSendmail v2007.08) id <0LV600100HKP1700@a-mtaout20.012.net.il> for 10127@debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 24 Nov 2011 20:49:37 +0200 (IST) Original-Received: from HOME-C4E4A596F7 ([84.228.50.247]) by a-mtaout20.012.net.il (HyperSendmail v2007.08) with ESMTPA id <0LV6000GEHMOIW60@a-mtaout20.012.net.il>; Thu, 24 Nov 2011 20:49:37 +0200 (IST) In-reply-to: <33462449944A4AD488077588779E681E@us.oracle.com> X-012-Sender: halo1@inter.net.il X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.11 Precedence: list Resent-Date: Thu, 24 Nov 2011 13:52:01 -0500 X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.6 (newer, 2) X-Received-From: 140.186.70.43 X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.bugs:54267 Archived-At: > From: "Drew Adams" > Date: Thu, 24 Nov 2011 10:29:44 -0800 > > There is no reason to base the display output width on the window > width of the current buffer - no relation. How else would you suggest to make the text aligned nicely? That's the intent, I believe.