From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Eli Zaretskii Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.help Subject: Re: IDE versus emacs Date: Fri, 19 Oct 2012 18:42:23 +0200 Message-ID: <83y5j2za4w.fsf@gnu.org> References: <83d30y87yi.fsf@gnu.org> <83626q7zvk.fsf@gnu.org> <87y5jl243r.fsf@gmail.com> <87pq4xbqup.fsf@wanadoo.es> <87d30xatgo.fsf@wanadoo.es> <20121006041754.GA30224@hysteria.proulx.com> <83pq4w6q3j.fsf@gnu.org> NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1350664967 5013 80.91.229.3 (19 Oct 2012 16:42:47 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Fri, 19 Oct 2012 16:42:47 +0000 (UTC) To: help-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Original-X-From: help-gnu-emacs-bounces+geh-help-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Fri Oct 19 18:42:55 2012 Return-path: Envelope-to: geh-help-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1TPFew-0003GY-DJ for geh-help-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Fri, 19 Oct 2012 18:42:54 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:48578 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1TPFep-0007ZQ-9Y for geh-help-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Fri, 19 Oct 2012 12:42:47 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.92]:54725) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1TPFeg-0007V7-Cb for help-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Fri, 19 Oct 2012 12:42:42 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1TPFee-00073l-VD for help-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Fri, 19 Oct 2012 12:42:38 -0400 Original-Received: from mtaout22.012.net.il ([80.179.55.172]:38672) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1TPFee-00073W-N6 for help-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Fri, 19 Oct 2012 12:42:36 -0400 Original-Received: from conversion-daemon.a-mtaout22.012.net.il by a-mtaout22.012.net.il (HyperSendmail v2007.08) id <0MC500I00FKJ0P00@a-mtaout22.012.net.il> for help-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Fri, 19 Oct 2012 18:42:34 +0200 (IST) Original-Received: from HOME-C4E4A596F7 ([87.69.4.28]) by a-mtaout22.012.net.il (HyperSendmail v2007.08) with ESMTPA id <0MC500HKGFQYR660@a-mtaout22.012.net.il> for help-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Fri, 19 Oct 2012 18:42:34 +0200 (IST) In-reply-to: X-012-Sender: halo1@inter.net.il X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: Solaris 10 (beta) X-Received-From: 80.179.55.172 X-BeenThere: help-gnu-emacs@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: Users list for the GNU Emacs text editor List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: help-gnu-emacs-bounces+geh-help-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: help-gnu-emacs-bounces+geh-help-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.help:87333 Archived-At: > From: Steinar Bang > Date: Fri, 19 Oct 2012 09:55:07 +0200 > > >>>>> Eli Zaretskii : > > > At least in C and C++, tags never miss a definition for me. My only > > problem with tags is that they sometimes show me more definitions > > other than what I had in mind that match the symbol I type, either > > because of case insensitivity or because of partial matches. > > Can tags filter out those symbols that would match what you're typing, > but aren't reachable from the point in the code where you are typing? I don't understand the question. Tags don't "match symbols", they show you the definition of the symbol. That definition is not related to scope.