From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Eli Zaretskii Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#16251: 24.3.50; `icomplete-mode' breaks my file opening now Date: Sat, 28 Dec 2013 10:51:21 +0200 Message-ID: <83y5352wae.fsf@gnu.org> References: <497ebd3d-d69b-4ac4-9d8c-ca2f4a1a2ac1@default> <818df3a7-a5fa-4871-86e1-0bd5d8e4a5fc@default> Reply-To: Eli Zaretskii NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1388220732 30202 80.91.229.3 (28 Dec 2013 08:52:12 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Sat, 28 Dec 2013 08:52:12 +0000 (UTC) Cc: 16251@debbugs.gnu.org To: Drew Adams Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sat Dec 28 09:52:15 2013 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1Vwpd1-0007uZ-4p for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Sat, 28 Dec 2013 09:52:15 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:51532 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Vwpd0-0001JU-Ql for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Sat, 28 Dec 2013 03:52:14 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:44491) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Vwpct-0001JH-L6 for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sat, 28 Dec 2013 03:52:12 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Vwpco-0003z7-PV for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sat, 28 Dec 2013 03:52:07 -0500 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([140.186.70.43]:33780) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Vwpco-0003yj-LL for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sat, 28 Dec 2013 03:52:02 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1Vwpco-0001U7-Ct for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sat, 28 Dec 2013 03:52:02 -0500 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: Eli Zaretskii Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Sat, 28 Dec 2013 08:52:02 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 16251 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs X-GNU-PR-Keywords: Original-Received: via spool by 16251-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B16251.13882207015671 (code B ref 16251); Sat, 28 Dec 2013 08:52:02 +0000 Original-Received: (at 16251) by debbugs.gnu.org; 28 Dec 2013 08:51:41 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:47799 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1VwpcT-0001TP-Iu for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Sat, 28 Dec 2013 03:51:41 -0500 Original-Received: from mtaout20.012.net.il ([80.179.55.166]:46925) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1VwpcR-0001TG-Aa for 16251@debbugs.gnu.org; Sat, 28 Dec 2013 03:51:40 -0500 Original-Received: from conversion-daemon.a-mtaout20.012.net.il by a-mtaout20.012.net.il (HyperSendmail v2007.08) id <0MYI00H00DOM8P00@a-mtaout20.012.net.il> for 16251@debbugs.gnu.org; Sat, 28 Dec 2013 10:51:38 +0200 (IST) Original-Received: from HOME-C4E4A596F7 ([87.69.4.28]) by a-mtaout20.012.net.il (HyperSendmail v2007.08) with ESMTPA id <0MYI00HN9DY12F70@a-mtaout20.012.net.il>; Sat, 28 Dec 2013 10:51:38 +0200 (IST) In-reply-to: <818df3a7-a5fa-4871-86e1-0bd5d8e4a5fc@default> X-012-Sender: halo1@inter.net.il X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 3.x X-Received-From: 140.186.70.43 X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.bugs:82682 Archived-At: > Date: Fri, 27 Dec 2013 16:55:11 -0800 (PST) > From: Drew Adams > Cc: 16251-done@debbugs.gnu.org > > completion-all-completions: 680 ms > deleting duplicates: 70 ms > sorting: 470 ms > > Of course, sorting depends on the sort predicate. This was with a > directories-first-then-alphabetical sort. How much time does sorting take if you request just alphabetical, without directories-first? It should take zero on Windows; if it doesn't, our sorting algorithm should be improved.