From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Eli Zaretskii Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#16901: 24.3.50; emacs_backtrace.txt Date: Sat, 01 Mar 2014 09:15:41 +0200 Message-ID: <83y50uv17m.fsf@gnu.org> References: Reply-To: Eli Zaretskii NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1393658173 7209 80.91.229.3 (1 Mar 2014 07:16:13 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Sat, 1 Mar 2014 07:16:13 +0000 (UTC) Cc: 16901@debbugs.gnu.org, dmantipov@yandex.ru To: Juanma Barranquero Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sat Mar 01 08:16:20 2014 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1WJe9k-0005I7-BW for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Sat, 01 Mar 2014 08:16:20 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:54462 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1WJe9j-0005nN-RA for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Sat, 01 Mar 2014 02:16:19 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:35352) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1WJe9b-0005mL-Q9 for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sat, 01 Mar 2014 02:16:17 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1WJe9S-00018a-S3 for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sat, 01 Mar 2014 02:16:11 -0500 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([140.186.70.43]:44069) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1WJe9S-00018K-Os for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sat, 01 Mar 2014 02:16:02 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1WJe9R-00070J-SV for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sat, 01 Mar 2014 02:16:02 -0500 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: Eli Zaretskii Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Sat, 01 Mar 2014 07:16:01 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 16901 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs X-GNU-PR-Keywords: moreinfo Original-Received: via spool by 16901-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B16901.139365814326879 (code B ref 16901); Sat, 01 Mar 2014 07:16:01 +0000 Original-Received: (at 16901) by debbugs.gnu.org; 1 Mar 2014 07:15:43 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:45247 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1WJe98-0006zR-4m for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Sat, 01 Mar 2014 02:15:42 -0500 Original-Received: from mtaout28.012.net.il ([80.179.55.184]:40867) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1WJe94-0006zH-5r for 16901@debbugs.gnu.org; Sat, 01 Mar 2014 02:15:39 -0500 Original-Received: from conversion-daemon.mtaout28.012.net.il by mtaout28.012.net.il (HyperSendmail v2007.08) id <0N1Q00M00VUOJJ00@mtaout28.012.net.il> for 16901@debbugs.gnu.org; Sat, 01 Mar 2014 09:15:56 +0200 (IST) Original-Received: from HOME-C4E4A596F7 ([87.69.4.28]) by mtaout28.012.net.il (HyperSendmail v2007.08) with ESMTPA id <0N1Q00GULXIKRA90@mtaout28.012.net.il>; Sat, 01 Mar 2014 09:15:56 +0200 (IST) In-reply-to: X-012-Sender: halo1@inter.net.il X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 3.x X-Received-From: 140.186.70.43 X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.bugs:86426 Archived-At: > From: Juanma Barranquero > Date: Fri, 28 Feb 2014 18:12:57 +0100 > Cc: Eli Zaretskii , Dmitry Antipov , 16901@debbugs.gnu.org > > > Maybe some development > > just before that build is responsible? > > These are the changes between the previous snapshot and the build from > Feb 22, except for the ones obviously unrelated (doc fixes, manual, > tests, etc.). Thanks; I see nothing that immediately stands out. It could be an unrelated change which just exposed a bug that was present previously. Or it could be some change in Drew's use patterns, like in the window/frame configurations and other customizations, which exposed an extant bug. Or even some changes in the OS and other programs used in conjunction with Emacs, for that matter. IOW, there's no way to be certain without a recipe, or something like that.