From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Eli Zaretskii Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: emacs-repository-version on MS-Windows Date: Sun, 16 Nov 2014 19:56:56 +0200 Message-ID: <83y4rbc9lj.fsf@gnu.org> References: <83vbmii0ud.fsf@gnu.org> <5465D212.20604@gmx.at> <83lhndj2b3.fsf@gnu.org> <83oas8dxmm.fsf@gnu.org> <3isihk87gt.fsf@fencepost.gnu.org> <87oas89jbt.fsf@igel.home> <834mtzdtfr.fsf@gnu.org> <87tx1zjeku.fsf@fencepost.gnu.org> Reply-To: Eli Zaretskii NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1416160674 9672 80.91.229.3 (16 Nov 2014 17:57:54 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Sun, 16 Nov 2014 17:57:54 +0000 (UTC) Cc: emacs-devel@gnu.org To: David Kastrup Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sun Nov 16 18:57:47 2014 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1Xq453-00039U-Rr for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Sun, 16 Nov 2014 18:57:45 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:44625 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Xq453-0006yK-HX for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Sun, 16 Nov 2014 12:57:45 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:37248) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Xq44i-0006yC-U9 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 16 Nov 2014 12:57:30 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Xq44d-0004aj-1Z for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 16 Nov 2014 12:57:24 -0500 Original-Received: from mtaout20.012.net.il ([80.179.55.166]:56920) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Xq44T-0004Xg-39; Sun, 16 Nov 2014 12:57:09 -0500 Original-Received: from conversion-daemon.a-mtaout20.012.net.il by a-mtaout20.012.net.il (HyperSendmail v2007.08) id <0NF500D0087SI600@a-mtaout20.012.net.il>; Sun, 16 Nov 2014 19:57:08 +0200 (IST) Original-Received: from HOME-C4E4A596F7 ([87.69.4.28]) by a-mtaout20.012.net.il (HyperSendmail v2007.08) with ESMTPA id <0NF500D7Z8J7IY00@a-mtaout20.012.net.il>; Sun, 16 Nov 2014 19:57:08 +0200 (IST) In-reply-to: <87tx1zjeku.fsf@fencepost.gnu.org> X-012-Sender: halo1@inter.net.il X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: Solaris 10 X-Received-From: 80.179.55.166 X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:177330 Archived-At: > From: David Kastrup > Date: Sun, 16 Nov 2014 17:27:29 +0100 > > Eli Zaretskii writes: > > > Btw, I think the packed-refs part is unnecessary, since the active > > branch will never be packed -- is that right? > > Not right. Thanks. I guess I've misunderstood the documentation, which seems to say that, even if all the refs has been packed, checking out a branch will immediately re-create the refs/heads/BRANCH file that was deleted by packing.