From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Eli Zaretskii Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#18197: 24.3.92; Get rid of ellipsis at beginning of window Date: Mon, 12 Jan 2015 18:22:31 +0200 Message-ID: <83y4p83r5k.fsf@gnu.org> References: <87wqanw8p5.fsf@geodiff-mac3.ulb.ac.be> <871tn0f7gn.fsf@yahoo.fr> Reply-To: Eli Zaretskii NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1421079799 6716 80.91.229.3 (12 Jan 2015 16:23:19 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Mon, 12 Jan 2015 16:23:19 +0000 (UTC) Cc: theonewiththeevillook@yahoo.fr, 18197@debbugs.gnu.org To: Nicolas Richard Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Mon Jan 12 17:23:12 2015 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1YAhlm-0005mg-Qj for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Mon, 12 Jan 2015 17:23:10 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:34974 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1YAhlm-0005Qa-6C for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Mon, 12 Jan 2015 11:23:10 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:55687) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1YAhli-0005QV-7p for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Mon, 12 Jan 2015 11:23:07 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1YAhle-0001za-7M for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Mon, 12 Jan 2015 11:23:06 -0500 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([140.186.70.43]:45777) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1YAhle-0001zV-4B for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Mon, 12 Jan 2015 11:23:02 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1YAhld-0000LC-OU for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Mon, 12 Jan 2015 11:23:01 -0500 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: Eli Zaretskii Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Mon, 12 Jan 2015 16:23:01 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 18197 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs X-GNU-PR-Keywords: Original-Received: via spool by 18197-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B18197.14210797541276 (code B ref 18197); Mon, 12 Jan 2015 16:23:01 +0000 Original-Received: (at 18197) by debbugs.gnu.org; 12 Jan 2015 16:22:34 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:54638 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1YAhlC-0000KV-7O for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 12 Jan 2015 11:22:34 -0500 Original-Received: from mtaout29.012.net.il ([80.179.55.185]:53840) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1YAhlA-0000KC-3n for 18197@debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 12 Jan 2015 11:22:33 -0500 Original-Received: from conversion-daemon.mtaout29.012.net.il by mtaout29.012.net.il (HyperSendmail v2007.08) id <0NI200N00NY53600@mtaout29.012.net.il> for 18197@debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 12 Jan 2015 18:19:16 +0200 (IST) Original-Received: from HOME-C4E4A596F7 ([87.69.4.28]) by mtaout29.012.net.il (HyperSendmail v2007.08) with ESMTPA id <0NI200L17O04BY20@mtaout29.012.net.il>; Mon, 12 Jan 2015 18:19:16 +0200 (IST) In-reply-to: <871tn0f7gn.fsf@yahoo.fr> X-012-Sender: halo1@inter.net.il X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 3.x X-Received-From: 140.186.70.43 X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.bugs:98268 Archived-At: > From: Nicolas Richard > Date: Mon, 12 Jan 2015 14:34:48 +0100 > Cc: 18197@debbugs.gnu.org > > Does someone know if this is actually a bug or just me having weird > expectations ? It's not a bug, in the sense that the code does what it was supposed to do in this situation. IOW, no one coded any special treatment for this situation, AFAIK.