From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Eli Zaretskii Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#19466: 25.0.50; xref-find-def doesn't find C functions Date: Sun, 01 Feb 2015 22:30:06 +0200 Message-ID: <83y4ohgysx.fsf@gnu.org> References: <8361cucl3u.fsf@gnu.org> <54A230CD.3040309@yandex.ru> <83vbktb1ct.fsf@gnu.org> <54A2EE15.3020406@yandex.ru> <831tnhasx0.fsf@gnu.org> <54A6DAF6.5070605@yandex.ru> <831tna9tmr.fsf@gnu.org> <54A9C94F.8040701@yandex.ru> <83vbkl99vm.fsf@gnu.org> <54B8878A.4050506@yandex.ru> <54B8C22B.3080200@gmx.at> <54BC7A77.5020307@yandex.ru> <54BCC033.2010104@gmx.at> <83oapuy8ew.fsf@gnu.org> <54BDC34C.5070309@yandex.ru> <83wq4hwejl.fsf@gnu.org> <54BEBF63.9050709@yandex.ru> <8361c0w16n.fsf@gnu.org> <54C063E3.8020401@yandex.ru> <83a91avglz.fsf@gnu.org> <54C1655E.4050403@yandex.ru> <83r3uluawd.fsf@gnu.org> <54C28635.8070606@yandex.ru> <83twzhryyq.fsf@gnu.org> <54C2C9DC.1050908@yandex.ru> <83h9vgsehi.fsf@gnu.org> <54C3CCB2.5030708@yandex.ru> <83y4ojjpqy.fsf@gnu.org> <54CD8E72.5000902@yandex.ru> <83ioflipt0.fsf@gnu.org> <54CE885C.8060202@yandex.ru> Reply-To: Eli Zaretskii NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1422822677 1876 80.91.229.3 (1 Feb 2015 20:31:17 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Sun, 1 Feb 2015 20:31:17 +0000 (UTC) Cc: 19466@debbugs.gnu.org, eller.helmut@gmail.com To: Dmitry Gutov Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sun Feb 01 21:31:15 2015 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1YI1An-0002qO-Ns for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Sun, 01 Feb 2015 21:31:13 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:51832 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1YI1Am-0003fS-Sp for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Sun, 01 Feb 2015 15:31:12 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:60929) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1YI1Ai-0003dH-Uz for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sun, 01 Feb 2015 15:31:09 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1YI1Ad-0005VH-SS for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sun, 01 Feb 2015 15:31:08 -0500 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([140.186.70.43]:40387) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1YI1Ad-0005V7-Pr for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sun, 01 Feb 2015 15:31:03 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1YI1Ac-0005ZX-WA for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sun, 01 Feb 2015 15:31:03 -0500 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: Eli Zaretskii Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Sun, 01 Feb 2015 20:31:02 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 19466 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs X-GNU-PR-Keywords: Original-Received: via spool by 19466-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B19466.142282264621395 (code B ref 19466); Sun, 01 Feb 2015 20:31:02 +0000 Original-Received: (at 19466) by debbugs.gnu.org; 1 Feb 2015 20:30:46 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:59860 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1YI1AK-0005Yz-ME for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Sun, 01 Feb 2015 15:30:46 -0500 Original-Received: from mtaout29.012.net.il ([80.179.55.185]:57753) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1YI1A4-0005YV-OZ for 19466@debbugs.gnu.org; Sun, 01 Feb 2015 15:30:30 -0500 Original-Received: from conversion-daemon.mtaout29.012.net.il by mtaout29.012.net.il (HyperSendmail v2007.08) id <0NJ400E000S2SQ00@mtaout29.012.net.il> for 19466@debbugs.gnu.org; Sun, 01 Feb 2015 22:26:44 +0200 (IST) Original-Received: from HOME-C4E4A596F7 ([87.69.4.28]) by mtaout29.012.net.il (HyperSendmail v2007.08) with ESMTPA id <0NJ4003MN0SJK390@mtaout29.012.net.il>; Sun, 01 Feb 2015 22:26:44 +0200 (IST) In-reply-to: <54CE885C.8060202@yandex.ru> X-012-Sender: halo1@inter.net.il X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 3.x X-Received-From: 140.186.70.43 X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.bugs:98960 Archived-At: > Date: Sun, 01 Feb 2015 22:11:08 +0200 > From: Dmitry Gutov > CC: 19466@debbugs.gnu.org, eller.helmut@gmail.com > > On 02/01/2015 06:01 PM, Eli Zaretskii wrote: > > >> What have you tried, exactly? > > > > I evaluated your suggested code, and then typed "M-.". > > If you recall, I gave you several options, with the end goal being > making the choice between them or maybe something else. > > So it would help if you mentioned exactly which one you tried and the > problems you experienced after. They all did the same, AFAICS. > >> You should have noticed that `M-.' in emacs-lisp-mode buffers behaves > >> like in other buffers and uses the current tags table (and prompts for > >> it if the tags table hasn't been visited yet). > > > > It does. > > Good. So why did you report not seeing any significant changes? Because I thought the effects were supposed to be more profound than that. > >> I've found one caveat now: even though the tags list is not buffer-local > >> (right?), (tags-lazy-completion-table) returns different results in > >> lisp/**/*.el buffers and src/*.c buffers. > > > > Yes, it's not 100% smooth. > > What do you mean by that exactly? What you discovered: the order of loading Emacs TAGS tables matters. I have never loaded lisp/TAGS directly, only src/TAGS, which then includes lisp/TAGS. > It can't be that same as what I meant because you've rejected the only > example I gave. I misunderstood your recipe, sorry. I only loaded src/TAGS.