From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Eli Zaretskii Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: VC mode and git Date: Wed, 25 Mar 2015 20:03:17 +0200 Message-ID: <83y4mlnee2.fsf@gnu.org> References: <86egoeusg2.fsf@example.com> <83pp7yp5po.fsf@gnu.org> <86sicte9j3.fsf@example.com> Reply-To: Eli Zaretskii NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1427306639 9782 80.91.229.3 (25 Mar 2015 18:03:59 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Wed, 25 Mar 2015 18:03:59 +0000 (UTC) Cc: emacs-devel@gnu.org To: Stefan Monnier Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Wed Mar 25 19:03:51 2015 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1Yapee-0001Ai-2T for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Wed, 25 Mar 2015 19:03:48 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:40612 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Yaped-0004oP-Co for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Wed, 25 Mar 2015 14:03:47 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:36950) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1YapeL-0004lt-84 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 25 Mar 2015 14:03:30 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1YapeI-00059c-AP for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 25 Mar 2015 14:03:29 -0400 Original-Received: from mtaout21.012.net.il ([80.179.55.169]:52541) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1YapeI-000596-2F for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 25 Mar 2015 14:03:26 -0400 Original-Received: from conversion-daemon.a-mtaout21.012.net.il by a-mtaout21.012.net.il (HyperSendmail v2007.08) id <0NLS00I004EDVN00@a-mtaout21.012.net.il> for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 25 Mar 2015 20:03:24 +0200 (IST) Original-Received: from HOME-C4E4A596F7 ([87.69.4.28]) by a-mtaout21.012.net.il (HyperSendmail v2007.08) with ESMTPA id <0NLS00IRS4TOV030@a-mtaout21.012.net.il>; Wed, 25 Mar 2015 20:03:24 +0200 (IST) In-reply-to: X-012-Sender: halo1@inter.net.il X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: Solaris 10 X-Received-From: 80.179.55.169 X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:184244 Archived-At: > From: Stefan Monnier > Date: Wed, 25 Mar 2015 11:04:51 -0400 > > I tend not to use the index very heavily (I'm still a fairly young Git > user, evidently), so I don't suffer from it too much, but it's clearly > wrong (an obvious problem is when the file is modified in the index and > this modification is undone in the actual file That's because you are not radical enough in not-using the index. I never get to the situation where a file is modified in the index. One problem less. (Of course, now I will be pounced upon by all the people who were brainwashed to think the index is a good idea. Please don't bother.)