From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Eli Zaretskii Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#20611: 24.4; mutt slow in ansi-term Date: Sat, 16 Apr 2016 13:11:07 +0300 Message-ID: <83y48dc18k.fsf@gnu.org> References: <20160409073937.GH1897@hindley.org.uk> <83mvp3i0l1.fsf@gnu.org> <20160410091526.GA25798@hindley.org.uk> <83d1pxgzy6.fsf@gnu.org> <87fuut2jfy.fsf@gmail.com> <83y48kf838.fsf@gnu.org> <87shyrntpm.fsf@gmail.com> <83lh4ig83z.fsf@gnu.org> <87inzml5n2.fsf@gmail.com> <838u0ifcxp.fsf@gnu.org> <20160413073735.GH25798@hindley.org.uk> <877fg2uer7.fsf@gmail.com> <834mb5ftgs.fsf@gnu.org> <87shynthkt.fsf@gmail.com> Reply-To: Eli Zaretskii NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1460801538 10336 80.91.229.3 (16 Apr 2016 10:12:18 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Sat, 16 Apr 2016 10:12:18 +0000 (UTC) Cc: mark@hindley.org.uk, mbork@mbork.pl, 20611@debbugs.gnu.org To: Alexis Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sat Apr 16 12:12:07 2016 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1arNCw-0006Lu-Ik for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Sat, 16 Apr 2016 12:12:06 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:52726 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1arNCv-0007uq-ND for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Sat, 16 Apr 2016 06:12:05 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:49180) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1arNCs-0007t8-Oc for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sat, 16 Apr 2016 06:12:03 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1arNCr-000232-UB for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sat, 16 Apr 2016 06:12:02 -0400 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.43]:52972) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1arNCr-00022y-RD for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sat, 16 Apr 2016 06:12:01 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1arNCr-0005iS-LE for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sat, 16 Apr 2016 06:12:01 -0400 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: Eli Zaretskii Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Sat, 16 Apr 2016 10:12:01 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 20611 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs X-GNU-PR-Keywords: Original-Received: via spool by 20611-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B20611.146080150221946 (code B ref 20611); Sat, 16 Apr 2016 10:12:01 +0000 Original-Received: (at 20611) by debbugs.gnu.org; 16 Apr 2016 10:11:42 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:37076 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1arNCY-0005hu-IH for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Sat, 16 Apr 2016 06:11:42 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.92]:58135) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1arNCW-0005hg-Ur for 20611@debbugs.gnu.org; Sat, 16 Apr 2016 06:11:41 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1arNCQ-0001y2-S3 for 20611@debbugs.gnu.org; Sat, 16 Apr 2016 06:11:35 -0400 Original-Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::e]:52392) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1arNCI-0001xf-Q0; Sat, 16 Apr 2016 06:11:26 -0400 Original-Received: from 84.94.185.246.cable.012.net.il ([84.94.185.246]:3024 helo=home-c4e4a596f7) by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.2:RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:128) (Exim 4.82) (envelope-from ) id 1arNCH-0007Fu-TK; Sat, 16 Apr 2016 06:11:26 -0400 In-reply-to: <87shynthkt.fsf@gmail.com> (message from Alexis on Fri, 15 Apr 2016 18:13:54 +1000) X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] X-Received-From: 208.118.235.43 X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "bug-gnu-emacs" Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.bugs:116518 Archived-At: > From: Alexis > Cc: mark@hindley.org.uk, 20611@debbugs.gnu.org, mbork@mbork.pl > Date: Fri, 15 Apr 2016 18:13:54 +1000 > > Eli Zaretskii writes: > > > Can you show a screenshot of a ansi-term display that behaves > > sluggishly > > Attached. > > > and also tell how many lines and how many characters are there > > in the buffer which is in ansi-term mode? > > M-x count-lines => "Buffer has 39 lines, 32 words, and 6512 > characters." What can I say? I'm stumped. Such small buffers should not be sensitive to dynamic determination of paragraph direction. But facts are stubborn, so I installed a change to force bidi-paragraph-direction to the 'left-to-right' value. Please try the latest emacs-25 branch, and if the problem is fixed, please close the bug. Thanks.