From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail From: Eli Zaretskii Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: About desktop file Date: Wed, 14 Sep 2016 20:30:09 +0300 Message-ID: <83y42u75jy.fsf@gnu.org> References: <3fe8a676-ba8c-cb76-2b65-de931073d5ca@alice.it> <834m5mbdkd.fsf@gnu.org> <808928eb-2050-da74-d217-30ad027081ba@alice.it> <83mvjd9ihp.fsf@gnu.org> <0bef0642-cba3-eae7-1fc3-64a0656a3c79@alice.it> <83r38n9902.fsf@gnu.org> <6a4c73a9-0581-137f-6b1b-20136006e7f4@alice.it> Reply-To: Eli Zaretskii NNTP-Posting-Host: blaine.gmane.org X-Trace: blaine.gmane.org 1473875491 2518 195.159.176.226 (14 Sep 2016 17:51:31 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@blaine.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Wed, 14 Sep 2016 17:51:31 +0000 (UTC) Cc: emacs-devel@gnu.org To: Angelo Graziosi Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Wed Sep 14 19:51:27 2016 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by blaine.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1bkEL8-0007VY-43 for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Wed, 14 Sep 2016 19:51:18 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:57838 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1bkEL6-0003Kr-8k for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Wed, 14 Sep 2016 13:51:16 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:50129) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1bkE0v-00046j-Of for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 14 Sep 2016 13:30:26 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1bkE0q-000297-1Y for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 14 Sep 2016 13:30:24 -0400 Original-Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::e]:52015) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1bkE0p-00028s-UX; Wed, 14 Sep 2016 13:30:19 -0400 Original-Received: from 84.94.185.246.cable.012.net.il ([84.94.185.246]:3768 helo=home-c4e4a596f7) by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.2:RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:128) (Exim 4.82) (envelope-from ) id 1bkE0n-0007zY-54; Wed, 14 Sep 2016 13:30:19 -0400 In-reply-to: <6a4c73a9-0581-137f-6b1b-20136006e7f4@alice.it> (message from Angelo Graziosi on Tue, 13 Sep 2016 23:35:31 +0200) X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] X-Received-From: 2001:4830:134:3::e X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.21 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "Emacs-devel" Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:207434 Archived-At: > Cc: emacs-devel@gnu.org > From: Angelo Graziosi > Date: Tue, 13 Sep 2016 23:35:31 +0200 > > > Because frames loaded from the desktop file override the init file > > settings. > > ..but the font configuration is not matter that desktop file should handle.. > > desktop file could override what isn't yet in the init file but not what > it has.. desktop.el restores various variables as well, thus overriding the init file. > otherwise which is the role of init file? For the stuff that is not in the desktop file. And we provide customization variables that allow users to control what is and isn't restored from the desktop file. > In any case, it seems we are wasting our time. If you think this > behavior is OK, leave as it is. As I wrote, I will continue to > regenerate the desktop file when I will find these kind of "issues" > because for me this is the best and clean solution. I think the cleanest solution is to customize frameset.el as suggested by Martin. But it's your call, of course.