From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail From: Eli Zaretskii Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: RFC: flicker-free double-buffered Emacs under X11 Date: Sun, 06 Nov 2016 17:46:32 +0200 Message-ID: <83y40wipbb.fsf@gnu.org> References: <9e8ad090-a6a0-c807-95ae-7ec7c3f391cb@dancol.org> <83k2d2rssf.fsf@gnu.org> <831sz9sime.fsf@gnu.org> <83y41hqz94.fsf@gnu.org> <838tte5fzq.fsf@gnu.org> <740d34db48a1e4b711cb1cfa987423c9.squirrel@dancol.org> <1706d8c5-118b-7d68-bd25-1f95b1787aa2@cs.ucla.edu> <57c7048e-a6d1-9908-0331-675073aa11e6@cs.ucla.edu> <83oa25rldi.fsf@gnu.org> <52e408a5-4d35-f4d0-a83e-61c71472a252@cs.ucla.edu> Reply-To: Eli Zaretskii NNTP-Posting-Host: blaine.gmane.org X-Trace: blaine.gmane.org 1478447225 8973 195.159.176.226 (6 Nov 2016 15:47:05 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@blaine.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Sun, 6 Nov 2016 15:47:05 +0000 (UTC) Cc: emacs-devel@gnu.org To: Paul Eggert Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sun Nov 06 16:47:01 2016 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by blaine.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1c3Pej-0000If-KJ for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Sun, 06 Nov 2016 16:46:49 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:44385 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1c3Pem-0004aY-HF for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Sun, 06 Nov 2016 10:46:52 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:55161) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1c3Pe3-0004ZD-GG for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 06 Nov 2016 10:46:08 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1c3Pe2-0003Tx-MC for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 06 Nov 2016 10:46:07 -0500 Original-Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::e]:48925) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1c3Pe2-0003Tt-JH; Sun, 06 Nov 2016 10:46:06 -0500 Original-Received: from 84.94.185.246.cable.012.net.il ([84.94.185.246]:4674 helo=home-c4e4a596f7) by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.2:RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:128) (Exim 4.82) (envelope-from ) id 1c3Pe1-000628-Hu; Sun, 06 Nov 2016 10:46:06 -0500 In-reply-to: <52e408a5-4d35-f4d0-a83e-61c71472a252@cs.ucla.edu> (message from Paul Eggert on Sat, 5 Nov 2016 20:51:11 -0700) X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] X-Received-From: 2001:4830:134:3::e X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.21 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "Emacs-devel" Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:209208 Archived-At: > Cc: emacs-devel@gnu.org > From: Paul Eggert > Date: Sat, 5 Nov 2016 20:51:11 -0700 > > Eli Zaretskii wrote: > > Please note that we already have "//" comments in a few places, so if > > we don't yet want to allow them, we should remove those. > > OK, I did that in the emacs-25 and master branches. Thanks. > If we start adding these comments, I suggest limiting them to code > in the master branch and making the style change a conscious > decision (e.g., when should code use "/*" vs "//" comments?). Agreed.