From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail From: Eli Zaretskii Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Skipping unexec via a big .elc file Date: Sun, 05 Feb 2017 17:51:52 +0200 Message-ID: <83y3xk7i07.fsf@gnu.org> References: <8360ojpndr.fsf@gnu.org> <83shrnm0k1.fsf@gnu.org> <075B0922-F07A-4FBA-AE71-027E964A5ED4@raeburn.org> <54AAC13A-CF56-4393-A932-DC6CBBF51259@raeburn.org> <3CC6BB36-1794-4202-8243-132E0345B236@raeburn.org> <52BDCC33-546C-4F47-A230-00EBC813B038@raeburn.org> <15CF14CC-C7DE-44BA-AC7D-F0BF1F160979@raeburn.org> <9463F91F-DB82-48E1-BE01-1E2BC8DA0766@raeburn.org> <831swxzbw8.fsf@gnu.org> <83y3z2wphb.fsf@gnu.org> <83tw9bb42m.fsf@gnu.org> <349ED8B9-C34B-495B-9FB5-E72CE6EFCA38@raeburn.org> <87inpni6xa.fsf@linux-m68k.org> <8360lmesso.fsf@gnu.org> <3B044D64-7C94-42D7-BE1B-7A9CA76C5A67@raeburn.org> <83k29xc49v.fsf@gnu.org> <2C5C5C6E-9D73-4613-948B-C15B93968717@raeburn.org> <83poiy8cnv.fsf@gnu.org> Reply-To: Eli Zaretskii NNTP-Posting-Host: blaine.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Trace: blaine.gmane.org 1486309938 25828 195.159.176.226 (5 Feb 2017 15:52:18 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@blaine.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Sun, 5 Feb 2017 15:52:18 +0000 (UTC) Cc: emacs-devel@gnu.org To: Ken Raeburn Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sun Feb 05 16:52:14 2017 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by blaine.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1caP6q-0006Tf-TQ for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Sun, 05 Feb 2017 16:52:13 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:43639 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1caP6w-0002Wy-GE for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Sun, 05 Feb 2017 10:52:18 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:52969) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1caP6h-0002R4-99 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 05 Feb 2017 10:52:04 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1caP6g-0008Qt-Ds for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 05 Feb 2017 10:52:03 -0500 Original-Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::e]:36009) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1caP6g-0008Qp-B1; Sun, 05 Feb 2017 10:52:02 -0500 Original-Received: from 84.94.185.246.cable.012.net.il ([84.94.185.246]:3663 helo=home-c4e4a596f7) by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.2:RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:256) (Exim 4.82) (envelope-from ) id 1caP6f-0002Be-3u; Sun, 05 Feb 2017 10:52:02 -0500 In-reply-to: (message from Ken Raeburn on Sun, 5 Feb 2017 09:19:38 -0500) X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] X-Received-From: 2001:4830:134:3::e X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.21 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "Emacs-devel" Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:211998 Archived-At: > From: Ken Raeburn > Date: Sun, 5 Feb 2017 09:19:38 -0500 > Cc: Emacs developers > > For now, I changed loadup.el to emit a “load” form to get characters.elc at startup, and that seems to be working. Copying the contents of characters.elc may be very slightly faster, but I haven’t done any timing tests. > > I also tracked down my new ja-dic-cnv problem. It looks like SKK-JISYO.L was being mangled on read because the input sequences weren’t recognized as Unicode compatible; this caused the resulting buffer not to be considered UTF-8 compatible, so it prompted for a coding system to write with. Calling unify-charset on the various charsets seems to be needed. > > With that change, I’m able to run “make bootstrap” in a GNU/Linux/X11 configuration and it runs to completion. I haven’t yet tested it on macOS, or compared the .elc for the differences you were describing. Thanks. Are those changes committed to the branch?