From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail From: Eli Zaretskii Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Skipping unexec via a big .elc file Date: Sat, 11 Mar 2017 15:42:07 +0200 Message-ID: <83y3wcc4ls.fsf@gnu.org> References: <9463F91F-DB82-48E1-BE01-1E2BC8DA0766@raeburn.org> <831swxzbw8.fsf@gnu.org> <83y3z2wphb.fsf@gnu.org> <83tw9bb42m.fsf@gnu.org> <349ED8B9-C34B-495B-9FB5-E72CE6EFCA38@raeburn.org> <87inpni6xa.fsf@linux-m68k.org> <8360lmesso.fsf@gnu.org> <3B044D64-7C94-42D7-BE1B-7A9CA76C5A67@raeburn.org> <83k29xc49v.fsf@gnu.org> <2C5C5C6E-9D73-4613-948B-C15B93968717@raeburn.org> <83poiy8cnv.fsf@gnu.org> <83r32mqq5f.fsf@gnu.org> <83zih1jf37.fsf@gnu.org> <8A8DA980-13A7-4F8B-9D07-391728C673C9@raeburn.org> <831su4dmn4.fsf@gnu.org> <87h9300x5n.fsf@linux-m68k.org> Reply-To: Eli Zaretskii NNTP-Posting-Host: blaine.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Trace: blaine.gmane.org 1489239804 30817 195.159.176.226 (11 Mar 2017 13:43:24 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@blaine.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Sat, 11 Mar 2017 13:43:24 +0000 (UTC) Cc: raeburn@raeburn.org, emacs-devel@gnu.org To: Andreas Schwab Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sat Mar 11 14:43:18 2017 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by blaine.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1cmhId-0006hk-TI for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Sat, 11 Mar 2017 14:43:12 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:43481 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1cmhIk-0007TL-1H for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Sat, 11 Mar 2017 08:43:18 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:34281) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1cmhHv-0007FV-UV for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 11 Mar 2017 08:42:28 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1cmhHs-0002ki-Si for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 11 Mar 2017 08:42:28 -0500 Original-Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::e]:44275) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1cmhHs-0002ke-Q1; Sat, 11 Mar 2017 08:42:24 -0500 Original-Received: from 84.94.185.246.cable.012.net.il ([84.94.185.246]:1272 helo=home-c4e4a596f7) by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.2:RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:256) (Exim 4.82) (envelope-from ) id 1cmhHs-0002nE-20; Sat, 11 Mar 2017 08:42:24 -0500 In-reply-to: <87h9300x5n.fsf@linux-m68k.org> (message from Andreas Schwab on Sat, 11 Mar 2017 14:18:28 +0100) X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] X-Received-From: 2001:4830:134:3::e X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.21 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "Emacs-devel" Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:212903 Archived-At: > From: Andreas Schwab > Cc: Ken Raeburn , emacs-devel@gnu.org > Date: Sat, 11 Mar 2017 14:18:28 +0100 > > On Mär 11 2017, Eli Zaretskii wrote: > > > So I think the issue could be that this defvar somehow doesn't end up > > in dumped.elc as an abbrev table under the new build procedure. Does that make sense? > > I think the problem is that an abbrev table is actually an obarray, > which does not have a suitable print syntax. Indeed, makes perfect sense. Thanks.