From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Path: news.gmane.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail
From: Eli Zaretskii <eliz@gnu.org>
Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel
Subject: Re: nxml-mode: Derive from prog-mode instead of text-mode
Date: Tue, 16 May 2017 21:54:06 +0300
Message-ID: <83y3tw63ap.fsf@gnu.org>
References: <1494412509.2069441.971865104.0646ACD6@webmail.messagingengine.com>
	<8337ccbrar.fsf@gnu.org>
	<1494439153.1311720.972341016.7C2EC66A@webmail.messagingengine.com>
	<83o9v0a66q.fsf@gnu.org>
	<1494487799.3240345.972964808.43DA610E@webmail.messagingengine.com>
	<CAArVCkR+jKEu49=H9CQ6jfhV890DQGfZgdVw9=R0KuDfEc_zVw@mail.gmail.com>
	<87r2zqvmy9.fsf@pokyo>
	<1494930855.4131543.978121176.7BB5246B@webmail.messagingengine.com>
Reply-To: Eli Zaretskii <eliz@gnu.org>
NNTP-Posting-Host: blaine.gmane.org
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
X-Trace: blaine.gmane.org 1494960911 11647 195.159.176.226 (16 May 2017 18:55:11 GMT)
X-Complaints-To: usenet@blaine.gmane.org
NNTP-Posting-Date: Tue, 16 May 2017 18:55:11 +0000 (UTC)
Cc: p.stephani2@gmail.com, tom@tromey.com, emacs-devel@gnu.org
To: jostein@kjonigsen.net
Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Tue May 16 20:55:07 2017
Return-path: <emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org>
Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org
Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17])
	by blaine.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2)
	(envelope-from <emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org>)
	id 1dAhcc-0002kU-HH
	for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Tue, 16 May 2017 20:55:02 +0200
Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:43501 helo=lists.gnu.org)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org>)
	id 1dAhci-0002iD-4M
	for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Tue, 16 May 2017 14:55:08 -0400
Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:38431)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <eliz@gnu.org>) id 1dAhbz-0002fu-Kh
	for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 16 May 2017 14:54:24 -0400
Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <eliz@gnu.org>) id 1dAhbv-0003ra-4B
	for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 16 May 2017 14:54:23 -0400
Original-Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::e]:43667)
	by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from <eliz@gnu.org>)
	id 1dAhbv-0003rW-0j; Tue, 16 May 2017 14:54:19 -0400
Original-Received: from 84.94.185.246.cable.012.net.il ([84.94.185.246]:2101
	helo=home-c4e4a596f7)
	by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.2:RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:256)
	(Exim 4.82) (envelope-from <eliz@gnu.org>)
	id 1dAhbu-0003tV-3Z; Tue, 16 May 2017 14:54:18 -0400
In-reply-to: <1494930855.4131543.978121176.7BB5246B@webmail.messagingengine.com>
	(message from Jostein =?utf-8?Q?Kj=C3=B8nigsen?= on Tue, 16 May 2017
	12:34:15 +0200)
X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic]
X-Received-From: 2001:4830:134:3::e
X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.21
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." <emacs-devel.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/options/emacs-devel>,
	<mailto:emacs-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/emacs-devel/>
List-Post: <mailto:emacs-devel@gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:emacs-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-devel>,
	<mailto:emacs-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org
Original-Sender: "Emacs-devel" <emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org>
Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:214889
Archived-At: <http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.emacs.devel/214889>

> From: Jostein Kjønigsen <jostein@secure.kjonigsen.net>
> Cc: jostein@kjonigsen.net, Eli Zaretskii <eliz@gnu.org>, emacs-devel@gnu.org
> Date: Tue, 16 May 2017 12:34:15 +0200
> 
> So before anything else, I would like to assess if we can have a majority agreement that prog-mode is NOT an
> implementation detail, but rather an API both users and developers are encouraged to use for
> programming-related activities and customizations.
> 
> If we can agree on that, I think there are options for moving forward.

Beware: you are shifting the focus of this discussion from nxml-mode
and its ilk, which was the original issue, to an almost completely
unrelated one.  There be a lot of unrelated bikeshedding (which
actually already began).