From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail From: Eli Zaretskii Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: `thunk-let'? Date: Mon, 27 Nov 2017 17:44:55 +0200 Message-ID: <83y3mr6808.fsf@gnu.org> References: <87infp9z6j.fsf@web.de> <87zi90eehg.fsf@web.de> <87o9ocd6s4.fsf@web.de> <87wp2zcwm2.fsf@web.de> <87mv3vwb2c.fsf_-_@web.de> <87h8tnowl4.fsf@web.de> <83vai3asgt.fsf@gnu.org> <83mv3eb85m.fsf@gnu.org> <87a7zdbsyf.fsf@web.de> <873755hbpr.fsf@web.de> <873754bm10.fsf@web.de> <83r2so9in9.fsf@gnu.org> <87r2sk8fg7.fsf@web.de> Reply-To: Eli Zaretskii NNTP-Posting-Host: blaine.gmane.org X-Trace: blaine.gmane.org 1511797532 30342 195.159.176.226 (27 Nov 2017 15:45:32 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@blaine.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Mon, 27 Nov 2017 15:45:32 +0000 (UTC) Cc: emacs-devel@gnu.org To: Stefan Monnier Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Mon Nov 27 16:45:27 2017 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by blaine.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1eJLau-0006wL-61 for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Mon, 27 Nov 2017 16:45:16 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:33361 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1eJLb1-0005F0-Il for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Mon, 27 Nov 2017 10:45:23 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:56632) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1eJLap-0005BS-Bi for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 27 Nov 2017 10:45:17 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1eJLaj-0001Kb-Oj for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 27 Nov 2017 10:45:11 -0500 Original-Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::e]:50152) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1eJLaj-0001KV-LW; Mon, 27 Nov 2017 10:45:05 -0500 Original-Received: from [176.228.60.248] (port=2077 helo=home-c4e4a596f7) by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.2:RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:256) (Exim 4.82) (envelope-from ) id 1eJLai-0002ZG-TN; Mon, 27 Nov 2017 10:45:05 -0500 In-reply-to: (message from Stefan Monnier on Mon, 27 Nov 2017 08:34:32 -0500) X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] X-Received-From: 2001:4830:134:3::e X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.21 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "Emacs-devel" Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:220484 Archived-At: > From: Stefan Monnier > Date: Mon, 27 Nov 2017 08:34:32 -0500 > > > Hmm - Would it even be acceptable to make `lazy-let' and `lazy-let*' the > > only names? > > I think you're over-thinking it. If I were you, I'd go with thunk-let > which doesn't need any authorization/argument, yet works well enough. > If/when it turns out to become wildly popular or unacceptably confusing, > we can add an alias and/or rename it. I agree.