From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail From: Eli Zaretskii Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#25061: consider adding %COMPAT to default gnutls priority string Date: Mon, 11 Dec 2017 17:40:05 +0200 Message-ID: <83y3m9s27e.fsf@gnu.org> References: <87zikiwpl6.fsf@igalia.com> <878trzo5ys.fsf@lifelogs.com> <87fum7o0qu.fsf@gnu.org> <87zikfmiiy.fsf@lifelogs.com> <878tq0dqgw.fsf@gnus.org> <87sho1gemz.fsf@gnu.org> <87vasigi2c.fsf@igalia.com> <871sv2krfc.fsf@lifelogs.com> <8360d1yzvj.fsf@gnu.org> <877exbhbc5.fsf@lifelogs.com> <87k21bj7sb.fsf@detlef> <87y3phgf3a.fsf@lifelogs.com> <83k210mr8l.fsf@gnu.org> <83374t117z.fsf@gnu.org> <87a7yra2bz.fsf@lifelogs.com> <83o9n7t669.fsf@gnu.org> <87k1xu90eg.fsf@lifelogs.com> <83indeu0xn.fsf@gnu.org> <87zi6p71dd.fsf@lifelogs.com> Reply-To: Eli Zaretskii NNTP-Posting-Host: blaine.gmane.org X-Trace: blaine.gmane.org 1513006935 19772 195.159.176.226 (11 Dec 2017 15:42:15 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@blaine.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Mon, 11 Dec 2017 15:42:15 +0000 (UTC) Cc: wingo@igalia.com, 25061@debbugs.gnu.org, ludo@gnu.org, michael.albinus@gmx.de, larsi@gnus.org To: Ted Zlatanov Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Mon Dec 11 16:42:09 2017 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by blaine.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1eOQDZ-0004r4-D1 for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Mon, 11 Dec 2017 16:42:09 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:54095 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1eOQDg-0004He-97 for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Mon, 11 Dec 2017 10:42:16 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:35716) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1eOQDV-0004B5-OH for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Mon, 11 Dec 2017 10:42:08 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1eOQDS-0008DH-94 for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Mon, 11 Dec 2017 10:42:05 -0500 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.43]:48307) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:16) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1eOQDS-0008D8-5Q for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Mon, 11 Dec 2017 10:42:02 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1eOQDR-0002Ik-Vm for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Mon, 11 Dec 2017 10:42:02 -0500 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: Eli Zaretskii Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Mon, 11 Dec 2017 15:42:01 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 25061 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs X-GNU-PR-Keywords: Original-Received: via spool by 25061-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B25061.15130068648761 (code B ref 25061); Mon, 11 Dec 2017 15:42:01 +0000 Original-Received: (at 25061) by debbugs.gnu.org; 11 Dec 2017 15:41:04 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:56986 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1eOQCQ-0002Gb-RK for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 11 Dec 2017 10:41:04 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.92]:44158) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1eOQCM-0002GL-0e for 25061@debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 11 Dec 2017 10:40:57 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1eOQCF-0007Ez-PB for 25061@debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 11 Dec 2017 10:40:48 -0500 Original-Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::e]:40281) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1eOQBm-0006oD-NG; Mon, 11 Dec 2017 10:40:18 -0500 Original-Received: from [176.228.60.248] (port=3758 helo=home-c4e4a596f7) by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.2:RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:256) (Exim 4.82) (envelope-from ) id 1eOQBm-00036u-2G; Mon, 11 Dec 2017 10:40:18 -0500 In-reply-to: <87zi6p71dd.fsf@lifelogs.com> (message from Ted Zlatanov on Mon, 11 Dec 2017 10:03:42 -0500) X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] X-Received-From: 208.118.235.43 X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "bug-gnu-emacs" Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.bugs:140930 Archived-At: > From: Ted Zlatanov > Cc: wingo@igalia.com, 25061@debbugs.gnu.org, ludo@gnu.org, michael.albinus@gmx.de, larsi@gnus.org > Date: Mon, 11 Dec 2017 10:03:42 -0500 > > The GnuTLS docs say it "will add a private extension with bogus data > that make the client hello exceed 512 bytes. This avoids a black hole > behavior in some firewalls. This is the [RFC7685] client hello padding > extension, also enabled with %COMPAT." https://gnutls.org/manual/html_node/Priority-Strings.html > > To me this appears benign and without downsides. Me too, but I don't consider myself an expert. I'm okay with doing that if you think it's safe and no one else objects. > Can anyone knowledgeable comment on any possible downsides to this? I'll > wait 3 days for objections, then make the change in emacs-26. Sounds like a good plan, thanks.