From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Eli Zaretskii Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Tabs Date: Thu, 10 Oct 2019 18:11:35 +0300 Message-ID: <83y2xsr5y0.fsf@gnu.org> References: <83wodeup6a.fsf@gnu.org> <20191009120534.ud6st2xvrv3rv6iy@Ergus> <83o8yqumdl.fsf@gnu.org> <20191009135539.c2i6ob52td6p34ab@Ergus> <83k19euhic.fsf@gnu.org> <20191009151502.524ulfzobcixz32l@Ergus> <83h84iue1w.fsf@gnu.org> <83d0f4stq3.fsf@gnu.org> <20191010132931.qt3y2kyonhcejzeb@Ergus> <838spssodu.fsf@gnu.org> <20191010144056.x57vqhedkhter4nx@Ergus> Injection-Info: blaine.gmane.org; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:195.159.176.226"; logging-data="18028"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@blaine.gmane.org" Cc: juri@linkov.net, emacs-devel@gnu.org To: Ergus Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Thu Oct 10 17:12:22 2019 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by blaine.gmane.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.89) (envelope-from ) id 1iIa72-0004Tw-B1 for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Thu, 10 Oct 2019 17:12:20 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:40868 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1iIa70-0001up-GI for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Thu, 10 Oct 2019 11:12:18 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:58738) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1iIa6e-0001uc-Fy for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 10 Oct 2019 11:11:57 -0400 Original-Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::e]:41290) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1iIa6Z-0000qk-K3; Thu, 10 Oct 2019 11:11:53 -0400 Original-Received: from [176.228.60.248] (port=1310 helo=home-c4e4a596f7) by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.2:RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:256) (Exim 4.82) (envelope-from ) id 1iIa6Y-0000VF-5h; Thu, 10 Oct 2019 11:11:51 -0400 In-reply-to: <20191010144056.x57vqhedkhter4nx@Ergus> (message from Ergus on Thu, 10 Oct 2019 16:40:56 +0200) X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.23 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "Emacs-devel" Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:240844 Archived-At: > Date: Thu, 10 Oct 2019 16:40:56 +0200 > From: Ergus > Cc: emacs-devel@gnu.org, juri@linkov.net > > I have a non so technical question here. I see that the tab-bar face is > defined completely in the code, but if instead we define it as > inheriting from a more "traditional/standard" face (like tool-bar or > similes) maybe the users that had already configured it will have the > impression of a better integration??. > > I mention this because many themes define a toolbar color/font and it > will be needed some time before they also define a tab-bar color, so > when emacs 27 will be released all the users with those themes will have > tabs not matching in their emacs appearance. I think we should simply have a prettier default for the tab-bar faces. They are currently too dull, IMNSHO.