From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Eli Zaretskii Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Add a separate mode for .dir-locals.el Date: Mon, 21 Oct 2019 13:09:51 +0300 Message-ID: <83y2xe2yvk.fsf@gnu.org> References: <2058328b-aee5-8cb1-2659-a793e1354517@mit.edu> <835zkndcz4.fsf@gnu.org> <83ftjrbjhm.fsf@gnu.org> <83ftjr9sx4.fsf@gnu.org> <83eezb9s5b.fsf@gnu.org> <83bluf9qgb.fsf@gnu.org> <835zkn9o01.fsf@gnu.org> <83lfti8ovn.fsf@gnu.org> <83d0eu8c80.fsf@gnu.org> <83lfth6p0y.fsf@gnu.org> <7f141905-6be3-2c21-e2af-b5926dd80223@gmail.com> <5c9ce9a7-aaa7-8299-e5be-498cb4f2b173@yandex.ru> <8336fo6koq.fsf@gnu.org> <09a6f3b6-6743-fe31-4be8-9283e59753fd@yandex.ru> <83eez64nw3.fsf@gnu.org> <8336fm4li7.fsf@gnu.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Injection-Info: blaine.gmane.org; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:195.159.176.226"; logging-data="87045"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@blaine.gmane.org" Cc: cpitclaudel@gmail.com, emacs-devel@gnu.org, monnier@iro.umontreal.ca, dgutov@yandex.ru To: =?utf-8?B?Sm/Do28gVMOhdm9yYQ==?= Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Mon Oct 21 12:10:29 2019 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by blaine.gmane.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.89) (envelope-from ) id 1iMUdx-000MLO-IN for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Mon, 21 Oct 2019 12:10:29 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:37098 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1iMUdw-0003cY-6P for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Mon, 21 Oct 2019 06:10:28 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:40591) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1iMUdT-0003cL-7m for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 21 Oct 2019 06:10:00 -0400 Original-Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::e]:34556) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1iMUdS-0004Xn-Ni; Mon, 21 Oct 2019 06:09:58 -0400 Original-Received: from [176.228.60.248] (port=1271 helo=home-c4e4a596f7) by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.2:RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:256) (Exim 4.82) (envelope-from ) id 1iMUdS-0002Mi-0w; Mon, 21 Oct 2019 06:09:58 -0400 In-reply-to: (message from =?utf-8?B?Sm/Do28gVMOhdm9yYQ==?= on Mon, 21 Oct 2019 09:25:00 +0100) X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.23 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "Emacs-devel" Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:241286 Archived-At: > From: João Távora > Date: Mon, 21 Oct 2019 09:25:00 +0100 > Cc: Dmitry Gutov , Clément Pit-Claudel , > Stefan Monnier , emacs-devel > > I don't agree that it's a nice feature. I don't even understand why > we give up so easily on elisp-mode support for such "data files", > > Because elisp-mode is for emacs-lisp programs, > not lisp data. Can you concede that, or is that still controversial? No, I disagree. Lisp data is as much Lisp as Lisp programs. There's no distinction in Lisp between data and code. This was also already said several times.