From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.io!.POSTED.ciao.gmane.io!not-for-mail From: Eli Zaretskii Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Why are so many great packages not trying to get included in GNU Emacs? Date: Fri, 08 May 2020 20:20:05 +0300 Message-ID: <83y2q2gx8a.fsf@gnu.org> References: <9mmFgzvrBwjt_n_VJyaJdXINraNi5HsGpwq-0MLeKiJA7kG2BQA4uywrzjyz7lpRS0OZDpjEi8lspOKYUA7P_QsODsDew_8nbH960G55fmY=@protonmail.com> <97DA7804-F647-4A1D-B8E0-AFFE7A324C64@gmail.com> <15bc138f-1c12-d8d2-7174-12a243030634@yandex.ru> <609f9461-8c02-dcf4-773d-562b8d1f717c@gmail.com> <834ksrj62j.fsf@gnu.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Injection-Info: ciao.gmane.io; posting-host="ciao.gmane.io:159.69.161.202"; logging-data="1599"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@ciao.gmane.io" Cc: cpitclaudel@gmail.com, ilya.ostapyshyn@gmail.com, casouri@gmail.com, emacs-devel@gnu.org, dgutov@yandex.ru, ndame@protonmail.com To: =?utf-8?B?Sm/Do28gVMOhdm9yYQ==?= Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Fri May 08 19:20:54 2020 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by ciao.gmane.io with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1jX6gA-0000HA-9L for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org; Fri, 08 May 2020 19:20:54 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:33140 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1jX6g9-00008l-AY for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org; Fri, 08 May 2020 13:20:53 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:44244) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1jX6fa-00081z-Rd for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 08 May 2020 13:20:18 -0400 Original-Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::e]:34091) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1jX6fZ-00079E-WD; Fri, 08 May 2020 13:20:18 -0400 Original-Received: from [176.228.60.248] (port=4186 helo=home-c4e4a596f7) by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.2:RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:256) (Exim 4.82) (envelope-from ) id 1jX6fZ-0005nO-Bz; Fri, 08 May 2020 13:20:17 -0400 In-Reply-To: (message from =?utf-8?B?Sm/Do28gVMOhdm9yYQ==?= on Fri, 8 May 2020 17:28:52 +0100) X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.23 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "Emacs-devel" Xref: news.gmane.io gmane.emacs.devel:249300 Archived-At: > From: João Távora > Date: Fri, 8 May 2020 17:28:52 +0100 > Cc: Clément Pit-Claudel , > ilya.ostapyshyn@gmail.com, ndame , > Yuan Fu , emacs-devel , Dmitry Gutov > > > But it doesn't do any harm, so it's your call whether to use it in > > such cases. I don't, FWIW. > > Got it. No Signed-off-by. But just so I understand, you're "borderline" > on Co-authored-by if that is motivated by the commit message > text. You're _not_ opposed to it if I add a comment to code, or > change some detail, right? I'm not opposed to it at all. If you feel you need to add that, I'm fine with that. (My own interpretation of co-authorship is that some serious code change would have to have place, but I see no reason not to leave this to the discretion of each one of us.)