From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.io!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Eli Zaretskii Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#45117: 28.0.50; process-send-string mysteriously exiting non-locally when called from timer Date: Thu, 10 Dec 2020 20:48:16 +0200 Message-ID: <83y2i533bj.fsf@gnu.org> References: <87h7ow4j4o.fsf@gmail.com> <83mtyo71dh.fsf@gnu.org> <877dps47ge.fsf@gmail.com> <83360g6xlt.fsf@gnu.org> <87im9b2pds.fsf@gmail.com> <83k0tr5700.fsf@gnu.org> <87360d3dud.fsf@gmail.com> <83eejx4rd6.fsf@gnu.org> <87r1nx1vtd.fsf@gmail.com> <87mtyl1v6y.fsf@gmail.com> Injection-Info: ciao.gmane.io; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:116.202.254.214"; logging-data="22857"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@ciao.gmane.io" Cc: joaotavora@gmail.com, 45117@debbugs.gnu.org To: Stefan Monnier Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Thu Dec 10 19:49:24 2020 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by ciao.gmane.io with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1knR0G-0005rZ-7k for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org; Thu, 10 Dec 2020 19:49:24 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:49768 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1knR0F-0001ZF-9X for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org; Thu, 10 Dec 2020 13:49:23 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:43428) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1knQzv-0001Z6-Sl for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Thu, 10 Dec 2020 13:49:03 -0500 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.43]:55962) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_128_GCM_SHA256:128) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1knQzt-0006W1-Q3 for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Thu, 10 Dec 2020 13:49:03 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1knQzt-00043o-Oi for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Thu, 10 Dec 2020 13:49:01 -0500 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: Eli Zaretskii Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Thu, 10 Dec 2020 18:49:01 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 45117 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs Original-Received: via spool by 45117-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B45117.160762612315584 (code B ref 45117); Thu, 10 Dec 2020 18:49:01 +0000 Original-Received: (at 45117) by debbugs.gnu.org; 10 Dec 2020 18:48:43 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:39275 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1knQza-00043H-GA for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 10 Dec 2020 13:48:43 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.92]:50162) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1knQzZ-000435-9r for 45117@debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 10 Dec 2020 13:48:41 -0500 Original-Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::e]:45731) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1knQzT-0006QR-RV; Thu, 10 Dec 2020 13:48:35 -0500 Original-Received: from [176.228.60.248] (port=3726 helo=home-c4e4a596f7) by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.2:RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:256) (Exim 4.82) (envelope-from ) id 1knQzT-0002dM-9w; Thu, 10 Dec 2020 13:48:35 -0500 In-Reply-To: (message from Stefan Monnier on Thu, 10 Dec 2020 13:37:59 -0500) X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "bug-gnu-emacs" Xref: news.gmane.io gmane.emacs.bugs:195684 Archived-At: > From: Stefan Monnier > Cc: Eli Zaretskii , 45117@debbugs.gnu.org > Date: Thu, 10 Dec 2020 13:37:59 -0500 > > But I had the impression that the original problem under discussion was > not just due to the difficulty of writing code that handles "random > aborts", but rather due to the fact that `while-no-input` sometimes caused > undesired random aborts even when the user didn't hit any key. > This would be a bug in `while-no-input` which we should investigate > a fix (it's likely due to some "innocuous" event being received which > `while-no-input` mistakes for user-input; could be an event linked to > some kind of notification service like dbus, file-notifications, ...). Let me remind you that we nowadays have while-no-input-ignore-events.