From: Eli Zaretskii <eliz@gnu.org>
To: Leo Liu <sdl.web@gmail.com>
Cc: larsi@gnus.org, 45610@debbugs.gnu.org, monnier@iro.umontreal.ca
Subject: bug#45610: 27.1; Symbol’s function definition is void: seq-concatenate
Date: Mon, 04 Jan 2021 17:07:08 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <83y2h8bv1f.fsf@gnu.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <m14kjx45xk.fsf@gmail.com> (message from Leo Liu on Mon, 04 Jan 2021 13:39:03 +0800)
> From: Leo Liu <sdl.web@gmail.com>
> Cc: Lars Ingebrigtsen <larsi@gnus.org>, 45610@debbugs.gnu.org, monnier@iro.umontreal.ca
> Date: Mon, 04 Jan 2021 13:39:03 +0800
>
> On 2021-01-03 17:46 +0200, Eli Zaretskii wrote:
> > In your opinion, is this better than my suggestion?
>
> I didn't comment much on this point last night.
>
> Adding (require 'seq) to cl-concatenate is probably the least favourable
> because it also defeats the purpose of the `inline' cl-proclaim.
>
> Adding autoload cookie for seq-concatenate is simple though not the
> cleanest, IOW, we have the workings of cl-concatenate in some situations
> depend on the autoload cookie. But this is not uncommon practice.
>
> Given the dilemma we are in I wonder if the considerations for `inline'
> cl-concatenate in the first place are no longer applicable.
Thanks.
Stefan, any comments? My personal tendency is to add the autoload
cookie, with a comment saying that cl-concatenate needs that. At
least on the emacs-27 branch. Any problems or issues with that? What
do people think about removing cl-concatenate from the inline
declaration (on master)?
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2021-01-04 15:07 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 14+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2021-01-02 12:29 bug#45610: 27.1; Symbol’s function definition is void: seq-concatenate Leo Liu
2021-01-02 12:47 ` Eli Zaretskii
2021-01-02 14:22 ` Leo Liu
2021-01-02 14:25 ` Eli Zaretskii
2021-01-02 16:07 ` Leo Liu
2021-01-02 16:30 ` Eli Zaretskii
2021-01-02 16:35 ` Lars Ingebrigtsen
2021-01-03 15:46 ` Eli Zaretskii
2021-01-03 16:19 ` Leo Liu
2021-01-04 5:39 ` Leo Liu
2021-01-04 15:07 ` Eli Zaretskii [this message]
2021-01-04 17:35 ` Stefan Monnier
2021-01-09 12:13 ` Eli Zaretskii
2021-01-02 16:45 ` Leo Liu
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=83y2h8bv1f.fsf@gnu.org \
--to=eliz@gnu.org \
--cc=45610@debbugs.gnu.org \
--cc=larsi@gnus.org \
--cc=monnier@iro.umontreal.ca \
--cc=sdl.web@gmail.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
Code repositories for project(s) associated with this external index
https://git.savannah.gnu.org/cgit/emacs.git
https://git.savannah.gnu.org/cgit/emacs/org-mode.git
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.