From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.io!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Eli Zaretskii Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Current mode command discovery Date: Wed, 17 Feb 2021 05:25:47 +0200 Message-ID: <83y2fn74uc.fsf@gnu.org> References: <87v9aubm96.fsf@gnus.org> <83a6s6bkrg.fsf@gnu.org> <87mtw6bkjo.fsf@gnus.org> <838s7qbjn2.fsf@gnu.org> <87eehi820x.fsf@gnus.org> <83v9at9xel.fsf@gnu.org> <87wnv8xlqa.fsf@gnus.org> <838s7o9g90.fsf@gnu.org> <87im6revhq.fsf@tcd.ie> <83im6r98qd.fsf@gnu.org> <87k0r7uade.fsf@gnus.org> <83eehf978r.fsf@gnu.org> <87ft1vu9hd.fsf@gnus.org> <838s7n95pf.fsf@gnu.org> <8735xvu7sx.fsf@gnus.org> <834kib94ha.fsf@gnu.org> <87sg5vspg5.fsf@gnus.org> Injection-Info: ciao.gmane.io; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:116.202.254.214"; logging-data="8838"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@ciao.gmane.io" Cc: contovob@tcd.ie, emacs-devel@gnu.org To: Lars Ingebrigtsen Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Wed Feb 17 04:26:15 2021 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by ciao.gmane.io with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1lCDTi-0002Bu-3A for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org; Wed, 17 Feb 2021 04:26:14 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:45494 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1lCDTg-00063I-MD for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org; Tue, 16 Feb 2021 22:26:13 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:59876) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1lCDTC-0005XY-2L for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 16 Feb 2021 22:25:42 -0500 Original-Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::e]:38856) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1lCDTB-0001Lm-7l; Tue, 16 Feb 2021 22:25:41 -0500 Original-Received: from 84.94.185.95.cable.012.net.il ([84.94.185.95]:2750 helo=home-c4e4a596f7) by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.2:RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:256) (Exim 4.82) (envelope-from ) id 1lCDT7-0002On-OG; Tue, 16 Feb 2021 22:25:40 -0500 In-Reply-To: <87sg5vspg5.fsf@gnus.org> (message from Lars Ingebrigtsen on Tue, 16 Feb 2021 21:55:06 +0100) X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.23 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "Emacs-devel" Xref: news.gmane.io gmane.emacs.devel:264975 Archived-At: > From: Lars Ingebrigtsen > Date: Tue, 16 Feb 2021 21:55:06 +0100 > Cc: contovob@tcd.ie, emacs-devel@gnu.org > > Eli Zaretskii writes: > > >> What the default completion predicate should be is totally up for > >> discussion, and we could take a poll. (Cries of horror ensue.) > > > > The current master already makes the behavior incompatible, so I'm not > > sure I understand how would you like to have a discussion about > > something that is already a "fait accompli". > > I'm not sure what you mean? What's a fait accompli here? The filtering. It's on master. > > Moreover, I thought I _was_ discussing how to make this filtering less > > radical and dangerous, but all I got in response was "don't worry, we > > are talking about this theoretical non-existing command, not about > > changing how M-x behaves". And now it turns out it _was_ about M-x > > after all. > > This thread was not about M-x until you made it be about M-x. The > default filtering in M-x was discussed in a different thread. I apologize for confusing threads, but it should have been clear that everything I say in the "wrong" thread was directly related to the discussions in the "right" thread.