From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.io!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Eli Zaretskii Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#48307: Feature request: provide default keybindings to change the font size in all windows Date: Mon, 10 May 2021 17:19:30 +0300 Message-ID: <83y2cm658t.fsf@gnu.org> References: <603bbc01-b1a2-b367-f54e-59a57475cbfe@gmail.com> <618a480bbe37bb9057f9@heytings.org> <999f8d7a-3c1b-bf72-dd15-472be09b8d34@gmail.com> <618a480bbe312e9a2db9@heytings.org> <24ec1bdc-b006-7ace-8320-8d45bb42daaa@gmail.com> <618a480bbe626e3a52c6@heytings.org> Injection-Info: ciao.gmane.io; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:116.202.254.214"; logging-data="30473"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@ciao.gmane.io" Cc: cpitclaudel@gmail.com, 48307@debbugs.gnu.org To: Gregory Heytings Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Mon May 10 16:20:12 2021 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by ciao.gmane.io with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1lg6lY-0007kq-EA for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org; Mon, 10 May 2021 16:20:12 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:59748 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1lg6lX-00008o-GV for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org; Mon, 10 May 2021 10:20:11 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:35374) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1lg6lO-00007b-Ns for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Mon, 10 May 2021 10:20:02 -0400 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.43]:50649) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_128_GCM_SHA256:128) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1lg6lO-0005Lj-Ff for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Mon, 10 May 2021 10:20:02 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1lg6lO-00086a-B0 for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Mon, 10 May 2021 10:20:02 -0400 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: Eli Zaretskii Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Mon, 10 May 2021 14:20:02 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 48307 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs Original-Received: via spool by 48307-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B48307.162065637331117 (code B ref 48307); Mon, 10 May 2021 14:20:02 +0000 Original-Received: (at 48307) by debbugs.gnu.org; 10 May 2021 14:19:33 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:33962 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1lg6kv-00085p-9J for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 10 May 2021 10:19:33 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.92]:53186) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1lg6kt-00085b-BV for 48307@debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 10 May 2021 10:19:31 -0400 Original-Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::e]:41202) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1lg6kn-00050L-Rz; Mon, 10 May 2021 10:19:26 -0400 Original-Received: from 84.94.185.95.cable.012.net.il ([84.94.185.95]:2149 helo=home-c4e4a596f7) by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1lg6kn-0008RL-CR; Mon, 10 May 2021 10:19:25 -0400 In-Reply-To: <618a480bbe626e3a52c6@heytings.org> (message from Gregory Heytings on Sun, 09 May 2021 22:56:34 +0000) X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "bug-gnu-emacs" Xref: news.gmane.io gmane.emacs.bugs:206155 Archived-At: > Date: Sun, 09 May 2021 22:56:34 +0000 > From: Gregory Heytings > Cc: 48307@debbugs.gnu.org > > > There's something more subtle happening, because using text-scale-adjust > > is much faster, even on a frame with a single buffer. > > Again I don't know, but I don't think so. AFAICS it's faster because > redisplaying a single buffer without changing the window and frame size is > faster than redisplaying all buffers in a frame and resizing the frame > itself. Enlarging the frame means we also interact with the WM and await its response, no?