From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.io!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Eli Zaretskii Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: [elpa] New package: vc-got Date: Sun, 17 Oct 2021 13:02:51 +0300 Message-ID: <83y26sezp0.fsf@gnu.org> References: <87zgsx7v08.fsf@omarpolo.com> <83y28hsqtg.fsf@gnu.org> <83tuj5spdi.fsf@gnu.org> <5f99f3b1-b1b9-20fa-df12-52eed3fedd3a@yandex.ru> <83sfypsp34.fsf@gnu.org> <83r1e9soh8.fsf@gnu.org> <835ytwgoj7.fsf@gnu.org> Injection-Info: ciao.gmane.io; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:116.202.254.214"; logging-data="21412"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@ciao.gmane.io" Cc: op@omarpolo.com, emacs-devel@gnu.org, timo.myyra@bittivirhe.fi, dgutov@yandex.ru To: Jean Louis Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Sun Oct 17 12:05:22 2021 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by ciao.gmane.io with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1mc32f-0005Ia-9Q for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org; Sun, 17 Oct 2021 12:05:21 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:37954 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1mc32d-0007qA-5a for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org; Sun, 17 Oct 2021 06:05:19 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:45878) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1mc30D-0005v5-Ar for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 17 Oct 2021 06:02:50 -0400 Original-Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::e]:48980) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1mc30B-0006oK-OO; Sun, 17 Oct 2021 06:02:47 -0400 Original-Received: from [87.69.77.57] (port=3832 helo=home-c4e4a596f7) by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1mc30B-0003up-BJ; Sun, 17 Oct 2021 06:02:47 -0400 In-Reply-To: (message from Jean Louis on Sun, 17 Oct 2021 10:33:39 +0300) X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.23 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "Emacs-devel" Xref: news.gmane.io gmane.emacs.devel:277208 Archived-At: > Date: Sun, 17 Oct 2021 10:33:39 +0300 > From: Jean Louis > Cc: dgutov@yandex.ru, timo.myyra@bittivirhe.fi, op@omarpolo.com, > emacs-devel@gnu.org > > * Eli Zaretskii [2021-10-17 09:21]: > > > Date: Sun, 17 Oct 2021 07:57:42 +0300 > > > From: Jean Louis > > > Cc: Dmitry Gutov , timo.myyra@bittivirhe.fi, > > > op@omarpolo.com, emacs-devel@gnu.org > > > > > > * Eli Zaretskii [2021-08-31 17:06]: > > > > How about keeping it out of vc-handled-backends, so that people who > > > > want could replace Git with Got? > > > > > > Git and Got are different VCS systems. Once can understand its > > > goals by reading the reference: > > > > Is that an agreement with my proposal, or its contradiction? And in > > any case, what is the rationale? > > It is just remark on differences. I don't think that people would > replace Git with Got as how I see it, Got is not replacement for > Git. It is VCS in its own. Yes, which is why I said "people who want". > I think Got and Git could be both in vc-handled-backends if user > wants it so. that has disadvantages, see the discussion.